Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OtherChap who wrote (1275)	2/24/1998 8:35:00 PM
From: Jamessmith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

OtherCrap: You are wrong again. You know nothing about NETZ, but you pretend you know everything about NETZ. You talk more loudly than anybody else, but you don't own any share of NETZ. Right now I doubt your claim: you are not hired by some people. NETZ acquired Softbank after a shell merger! You just don't have any facts! The combination of Zulu and Softbank will be better than DCLK. Time will tell!!! James.

To: OtherChap who wrote (1275)	2/24/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: Michael Harb	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Chump, you are just dumb as hair. <<Finally, if NETZ had better financials than DoubleClick, why were they unable to get any major brokerage to take them public? Why did they have to go the reverse shell merger route onto the penny OTC boards? Answer that one? If I were a big underwriter (who, by the way, are probably the only ones outside of netz who do know the financials) I would take NETZ public in a second if they actually had better numbers than DoubleClick. But they havnt. Why? >> Why do you assume they wanted a major brokerage to take them public. They were much smaller before the Softbank acquisition. There's another big company I know of that did a reverse merger. Muriel Siebert. You know "the first female member of the NYSE", large discount broker. This financially savvy woman took her company public through a shell. It is a hell of a lot cheaper than retaining an investment banker. Well, NETZ up near .70. When was it I was supposed to be crying on your shoulder? Here is how the top few MM's finished today for anyone who is interested. FAHN .65 SHWD .69 HILL .65 GURU .69 WUSA .65 HILL .70 SHRP .65 WUSA .70 ALEX .64 NAWE .71 mike

To: OtherChap who wrote (1275)	2/24/1998 8:58:00 PM
From: TokyoMex	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 18444

Watch ,, another BAAT in making,,, Only thing positive so far is ,, they stopped printing,, like last Qt.. Wonder, when indeed they will start the press again ... Enjoy the ride boys.. Until I see the actual product on the web ,, not in a magic box at a trade show.. off the memory.. Joe

To: OtherChap who wrote (1275)	2/24/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Theo	Respond to of 18444

OtherChap, Why are you here? You have made your point numerous times to numerous people. If I say I believe you, will you go away? I don't doubt your convictions, nor will I come out and say you are wrong. Point is, what does it matter. Until NETZ releases numbers, none of us knows. And I can't for the life of me figure out why somebody such as yourself would spend so much time complaining about a stock you don't own????? Going over your profile, I can't find any stock you like. I've never seen anything stranger. You hate everything! Most people are looking for and participating in something they like. What stocks are you in? Quote from OtherChap:~~"I feel pity for you guys..."~~ You don't really expect anyone to believe that do you? ~~"For the ones who manage to dump their shares at a profit, good for you."~~ So you're saying anytime anybody sell shares for a profit it's actually a "dump"? ~~"I would take NETZ public in a second if they actually had better numbers than DoubleClick. But they havnt. Why? The answer is- their REAL numbers, when they come out, are going to disappoint or even frighten away everyone. Pretty strong accusations. You have proof they don't have better numbers? You better hope when the numbers do come out that you are right, cause if you are wrong, some legal eagle could have a field day with you. If you have proof to the contrary, then come clean. You don't or won't or you would have already. I'm too tired to pick apart your post anymore. Gotta do that work thing in the a.m.. G'nite all. Theo

To: OtherChap who wrote (1275)	2/25/1998 6:29:00 AM
From: BlackStar	Respond to of 18444

If NETZ had better financials that DCLK, the private investment community would know it. Companies dont operate in a vaccuum. Well, you see, to some extent certain companies do. Especially if they start out down here. BBs are 'forbidden land' for most Wall Street types. It 'bad' to invest in anything down here regardless of prospects. So a whole lot could be going on here without it making one single blip on the Wall Street radar. The only thing regarding financials that NETZ has _ever_ posted is that if you count the revenues that softbank interactive had LAST year, then "they" had more revenues than doubleclick in that time period. That is all. They could have also picked up 50 million in debt, they could also be planning a huge reverse split, they could also have lost all their existing softbank contracts. 'They could...', 'They could...'. Well you could grow some perception too, but at this point I find it as likely as your conjecture. Getting in at this level is an excercise in faith. All is not known. Reasonable guesses must be made. If you cannot invest like that you should stay away from BBs...and respect those who try. Instead of any hint at financials, all we get are repeated press releases denying a buyout rumor and mentioning their name along with doubleclick at every possible chance. $39 mil rev feels like a pretty solid hint to me... Or do you think I am mistaken? They published it, it's official and therefore libelous. There is substance in NETZ. $39 mil worth... If some of that is profit, excellent; if not then that is ok too. Finally, if NETZ had better financials than DoubleClick, why were they unable to get any major brokerage to take them public? Why did they have to go the reverse shell merger route onto the penny OTC boards? Easy. Using a dormant shell with an existing stock structure means you can get listed a lot faster and at a much lower cost than an IPO. Also, when NETZ started out they didn't have Softbank etc. A lot of the spokes in the wheel was missing. If NETZ had been a privately owned long standing company it would most certainly have used an IPO to go public. Using a shell is a different tactic and I hope to make some money off of it. I suspect most other investors are. If I were a big underwriter (who, by the way, are probably the only ones outside of netz who do know the financials) I would take NETZ public in a second if they actually had better numbers than DoubleClick. But they havnt. Why? The answer is- their REAL numbers, when they come out, are going to disappoint or even frighten away everyone. There you go putting yourself in a position you are clearly not equipped to handle. I would say with some confidence that nobody here has a full, on all levels detailed insight into NETZ and its plans. And very few, I am sure, could maneuvre a company from zero to comparable with DCLK in a few months. NETZ mgmt has shown some quality, let's see if it will take us all the way. Your move.