Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Tesla EVs - TSLA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (26206)	8/12/2025 1:35:32 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By gg cox longz Respond to of 26728

Interesting that you use the word "stole". I don't mean it in a hostile way or even accusatory. They had the right to steal it. My issue is with the fact that the extreme leftist publication avoided giving credit to Tesla for having created the technique, and I assume it was based on TDS (Tesla Derangement Syndrome). I'm sure they just forgot to mention it was a technique invented by Tesla's engineers. It's all good....

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (26206)	8/12/2025 2:13:24 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26728

To be clear, I do use "stole" to refer to Biden "winning" the election. That was clearly theft. OTOH, sometime I "steal" a paragraph or "steal" a couple of onion rings, or I "stole the magic marker off your desk" or "steal" someone's idea without claiming it as their idea. I use the term loosely like that. The election was plainly stolen, but to date, no one has been brought to trial for it, and I doubt they will in the future. OTOH, if what Zuckerberg did wasn't "stealing" an election, I don't know what is. If the rigging of vote counting operations in multiple states (but notabily PA) wasn't stealing an election, we might as well just eliminate use of the term because it was plain as day.