SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (1553362)8/19/2025 4:43:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
pocotrader
sylvester80

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571864
 
Bill,
If you don't believe it, look it up.
I did look it up. I couldn't find it. I'm not doing your homework for you.

MAGA loves to make shit up and demand to be proven otherwise. Been there, done that, samo samo.
I stated the applicable law "doesn't distinguish between a fist and a sandwich." The perp was arrested and arraigned on a felony assault charge under 18 U.S.C. § 111(a).
The applicable standard here isn't "fist vs. sandwich," but rather "reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm."

No jury is going to consider a sandwich to be a deadly weapon. No jury is going to consider that perp's fists to be a deadly weapon.

You explicitly stated that the standard for felony assault applies here, whether it be fist or sandwich, but it clearly does not.

"Pwn the libs" ...

Tenchusatsu