SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1560078)9/22/2025 5:05:31 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578553
 
As you can see, artificial intelligence isn't intelligent. I read the refutation with interest. A load of pedantry. I should have written a 1000 page dissertation citing all the details according to that review. It for the most part just wrote that since photographic court of law affidavit based evidence with a two year investigation of 1000 pages wasn't given we can't know anything.

The murderer of Charlie Kirk was right in one aspect. When reasoning and discussion fails, dumb brute force and murder of the opposition is the result. Charlie Kirk explained that's what happens and why he was so determined to discuss and reason.

Your artificial intelligence lacked reasoning. I explained why nuclear war is coming. The silly AI thought it cleverly out-argued me. It should have given and figured out for itself who bombed Nordstreams. Saying I didn't give evidence was pathetic. Seymour somebody.... Circumstantial evidence is good enough when survival is at stake. As they say, once is annoying, twice a coincidence, three times = enemy action. The dumb AI is right that three times or forty times isn't evidence, but as Charlie found out, reasoning doesn't beat a bullet.

I don't think Russia is interested in your AI pedantry. They are being attacked and were under attack from when Nuland spearheaded the military coup which was murder, not a vote. Wisely, Russia went straight onto defence, taking possession of Crimea which they already had possession of, and sending in troops to back the independence people while USA poured in support and troops to back the coup and conquest of the rest and Russia.

Best to do thinking yourself. Your AI basically told you to ignore what I wrote and carry on regardless. Good luck with that. Charlie found out and already knew what happens when reasoning stops and bullets fly.

The bullets are flying. Rockets are flying. Atomic bombs are ready. You can carry on or try thinking. My experience is that most people can't reason and prefer shooting. Charlie took a first strike. He didn't have a dead hand retaliation available.

I know most of your team simply chant their mindless catechism "Russia invaded Ukraine for no reason, so we have to go full scale deflection and conquer them".

That's moronic thinking that ignores Nuland Obama CIA murder and all that's gone before that led to it.

Loony lefties simply chant their catechisms and start shooting. Russia isn't My Lai. Russia has atomic bombs and will use them, hoping to force survival sense into the mad megalomaniacs.

Mqurice



To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1560078)9/22/2025 5:38:39 AM
From: IC7202 Recommendations

Recommended By
longz
Maurice Winn

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578553
 
May need to reconsider why Putin invaded. Some believe he had every right invading Ukraine. Minsk Agreement being main, where Europe/NATO has wanted War for profit/economic decline, adding several other reasons with NATO moving borders into Russia, Z saying may rearm Ukraine with nukes. Harris in Ukraine telling Z should join NATO, Ukraine Nazis ethnic killing all who speak Russian in The Donbas, who Ci'a trained and it's 2014 regime change coup.Then have to ask, why did US have 30+ bio labs in Ukraine proven most corrupt country on planet? So in math, why are US tax payers sending money paying Ukraine pensions, govt officials?

There are no “good guys” in this conflict, but Russia initiated the invasion and remains the primary aggressor.