Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (8348)	2/25/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 20981

It makes me very happy that Starr has such integrity that he will not bend to unprecedented attacks by an out-of-control White House. It's reassuring that Starr is so calm and professional. Surely Duncan you don't really believe what you just wrote. Starr is dangerously out of control in his subpoenas looking for who is releasing information about himself and his underlings. Equating criticism and factual accounts of past abuses by his staff to obstruction of justice, is what is "out of control". Issuing subpoenas for this purpose is witch hunting pure and simple. So you are saying that what has been said about the investigators is untrue? I have yet to hear any denials about this. Regardless of the source, we all have a right to know how these people, who have portrayed themselves as above reproach, have conducted themselves in the past. You would hold the President to the highest standard of conduct, but would set a lower one for his prosecutors and a judicial process that would remove him from office. Starr is not above reproach. He has shown himself to be a partisan, and now a man of double standards. If you believe Starr is impartial, I'll bet you believed the Martians in Mars Attacks.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (8348)	2/25/1998 11:29:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 20981

Btw, don't you find it amazing that Ginsburg now says that Monica stands by her affadavit of no sex after he spent weeks saying on numerous TV shows that Monica would admit to the opposite? That was Monica's "other" personality, silly. The current Monica can hardly be responsible for something said by another personality. For practical purposes, they're two different people! The other Monica is a liar and fantasizer, whereas the current Monica is the sane one; the one that signed the affidavit. This all seems so obvious to me that it surprises me that I would have to point it out. Ask Holly for further clarification; she understands this perfectly. DK