Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: vkvraju5 who wrote (195812)	9/30/2025 6:14:55 PM
From: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	7 Recommendations Recommended By Dr. John Ken Carrillo Lance Bredvold pheilman_ ryhack and 2 more members Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 196722

Hard to say, Arm did want the court to decide in this case so it could make decisions in the Qualcomm v. Arm case. It's hard to say what Qualcomm would do here -- would they trust Arm that just tried to stab them in the back to not screw them in the future? Or would they use Qualcomm v. Arm to have a court binding requirement for economically feasible licensing in the future? I'm not a lawyer so I have no clue if the court could impose that requirement. Currently, the Qc v. Arm case it just finished expert reports and we're going to have dispositive motions in October. I suspect both sides would wait to see each others summary judgement claims among other things before trying to settle.