Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN who wrote (195813)	9/30/2025 7:12:29 PM
From: ryhack	6 Recommendations Recommended By abcs Dr. John JeffreyHF sbfm SirWalterRalegh and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196720

On the great news that Nuvia & Q didn't violate the Nuvia ALA...and Q was validly licensed under its own ALA with ARM, I can't imagine that Q management would let ARM's flagrant harm to Q go without some punishment in the form of heavy compensation. Moreover, at a minimum, it seems to me that Q's license with ARM must be extended beyond the current license - which is valid through 2033 - by at least that period of time (months and years) that ARM intentionally withheld contract deliverables from Q in order to purposefully harm and hobble Q's competitive pursuits. using its newly acquired Nuvia technology. I believe that Q suggested that ARM first began withholding deliverables in the Fall of 2022. So let's now extend Q's ALA with ARM for an additional 3 years beyond 2033 (assuming that deliverables are still not being provided in their contractual entirely). It will be very interesting to see how this whole dispute shakes out...so far, so good!