Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.B.C. who wrote (5526)	2/25/1998 2:49:00 PM
From: David Pawlak	Respond to of 10479

JBC- I count only 2 releases put out by the company. The other 2 releases I think you are referring to were put out by other companies who are using FIBR's product (VSIO I believe and the company who's software is being used in the Net+Arm chip).

To: J.B.C. who wrote (5526)	2/25/1998 2:51:00 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10479

<< 1. Go into the market and buy loads of it. Not a good way to start your dumping phase by buying more. >> All it takes is a few well placed buys after a little hype and traders like yourself will take care of the rest. << 2. Hype the stock. There have been only 4 releases since Jan 1, QCOM released about a dozen alone this week, so hardly anything abnormal about FIBR in this regard. >> QCOM is a lot bigger than FIBR. Not surprising that they would have more press releases going on. Second of all, what do you call that crap abut taking $7 billion of the chip market? H-Y-P-E. << 3 Increase profit, and let the stock buyers take over from there. I don't know what FIBR will do on this, still unproven in my opinion, but we'll see. >> There are interesting ways of doing that, believe me. All kinds of ways of manufacturing a profit. << Give me your take on how they might be proping the price up to higher levels, to get themselves out. >> I don't want to spend a lot of time trying to explain something that is difficult to prove. It would also take a lot of explaining that I don't want to get into now.

To: J.B.C. who wrote (5526)	2/25/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: David Pawlak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

I just stumbled across another article on the Net+Arm chip as I was going through my mail. This one appears in the Feb 18 issue of ENT Magazine, which is a trade journal directed at Windows NT administrators and system integrators. The article takes up about 1/4 page on the first page and about 1/2 of the continuation page.