SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SJSharky who wrote (8264)2/25/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: prakash  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13594
 
Stong day like today couldn't lift AOL. Sign of reversal of fortune?

Prakash - Looking for an entry point to short again.



To: SJSharky who wrote (8264)2/26/1998 3:37:00 AM
From: J.S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
Ryan,
"IF they can achieve the type of profit growth the street is expecting, then I believe the
current valuation is justified."

That's a big if as you correctly indicated. Even if this is true it
certainly is not got enough. Everyone has to admit that there is a good chance that AOL won't make such numbers. If if does, then this means that AOL will be worth perhaps close to 100 in three years or
so. But then people predict the stock should be worth 200 by then
because of earnings in the year 2005 or beyond. If not then it is hardly worth taking a huge risk only to have your stock value remain the same after three or four years.

If that's not enough, analysts are certainly not taking into account
the dilution that is occurring. This is one of the big reasons AOL
won't make next quarters numbers fully diluted!

Joe



To: SJSharky who wrote (8264)2/26/1998 7:49:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13594
 
>>the market value of a company comes from how much future earnings potential it has.<<

W-R-O-N-G. it's value is based on what people p-e-r-c-e-i-v-e its future earnings potential to be. real is not equal to imagined. the people have flat out lost their mind on aol. ;-)