SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/13/2025 1:33:05 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
Added to long put positions on TSMC and on QQQ, and initiated new long position on ASML puts, as speculation for I do not have any hedging requirement

Am suspecting Team China sanctions by rare earths, industrial diamonds, and various other foundational layer periodic table goodies all at the same time might not be short term / tactical in nature that would be resolved by expediency of Trump-Xi meeting. The matter might be considerably more intractable and therefore serious.

Team Trump claims of surprise is likely untrue.

And no, Team China does not want any products by TSMC, ASML, or any of QQQ constituent companies, and that is problematic for the bubble.

All very interesting export.org.uk

The Dutch actually made move end-September. No Huawei founder’s daughter to kidnap this time so a meaningless 180 nanometer automotive chip company tee-ed up.

So, and yes, the answer is, once more, gold



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/13/2025 2:11:01 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Pogeu Mahone

  Respond to of 217588
 
Re <<scary. careful>>

Re this Message 35294716 , I just shorted puts of PAAS, FNV, and OR to generate the cash that is equal to the debited amounts for the long puts, for who knows, maybe gold and silver miners might continue to go up, or at least not-fall, even as ASML, TSMC, and QQQ falls

The just shorted puts expire November ‘25 (FNV, PAAS) / January’26 (OR)
The long puts expire March ‘26 (ASML) / June ‘26 (TSMC, QQQ)

Call me an optimist :0)

Fidget fidget



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/13/2025 9:52:00 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

bloomberg.com

The Great Debasement Debate Is Rippling Across Global Markets?

Summarise?

By Ruth Carson, Naomi Tajitsu, and Masaki Kondo
October 14, 2025 at 7:30 AM GMT+8
Beneath the surface of the short-term ups and downs of financial markets, a longer-term repricing of multiple assets may be underway as investors seek to protect themselves from the threats posed by runaway budget deficits.

While a fresh round of tariff threats between the US and China stole the headlines Friday and sent traders scurrying from riskier assets and into bonds, money managers have been increasingly discussing a phenomenon known as the “debasement trade.”

Those who believe in it are pulling away from sovereign debt and the currencies they are denominated in, fearful their value will be eroded over time as governments avoid tackling their massive debt burdens and even seek to add to them.

Further fuel is coming from speculation that central banks will face increasing political pressure to hold down interest rates to offset what governments owe — and in the process fan inflation by continuing to crank out cash.

Just last week, Japan’s yen and its bonds were hit by waves of selling as stimulus-friendly Sanae Takaichi took a step toward becoming prime minister. Another round of political turmoil in France over its finances jolted the euro, and a looming budget in the UK is unnerving a gilt market still scarred by the 2022 selloff that swept Prime Minister Liz Truss from power.

While the dollar has risen in recent weeks despite the US government shutdown, it’s still weaker over the course of this year after President Donald Trump’s trade war and tax-cut plans earlier sent it into the deepest tailspin since the early 1970s. His America First break with the global order and assault on the Federal Reserve’s independence have also sown doubts about whether Treasuries will continue to fully enjoy their status as the world’s main risk-free asset — underpinning long-term bond yields.

On the other side of the debasement trade, precious metals are benefiting from their traditional haven status and cryptocurrencies are rallying again, this time due to their purported function as a refuge from the impacts of government policy. Gold is up over 50% this year and recently surpassed a record $4,000 per ounce, while silver surged to an all-time high.

And while cryptocurrencies posted steep drops after Trump’s latest tariff threats spooked sentiment, Bitcoin is still up more than 20% this year and hit an all-time high.

Stephen Miller says he’s never seen as big a shift away from currencies and Treasuries into alternatives during his four decades of working in markets. The former head of fixed-income at BlackRock Inc. in Australia reckons it may just be the start.

“The debasement trade still has some way to run,” said Miller, who is now a consultant at GSFM, a unit of Canada’s CI Financial Corp. “US Treasuries just aren’t the unimpeachable safe harbor asset that they once may have appeared and it’s a phenomenon repeated across other bond markets.”

Billionaires Ray Dalio and Ken Griffin have captured headlines by suggesting that gold may be safer than the dollar. The head of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board thinks US Treasuries are also at risk of losing their haven status. And the author and hedge-fund advisor Nassim Taleb says the ballooning US deficit is sowing the seeds of a debt crisis it appears virtually impossible to avoid.

“The world is seeing a deterioration not just in the inflation-adjusted value of their currencies amid slowing activity, but also a deterioration in the stability of government,” said Calvin Yeoh, who helps run the Merlion Fund at Blue Edge Advisors in Singapore and has been buying gold.

The term debasement dates back to when rulers such as King Henry VIII and Nero diluted or debased their gold and silver coins with cheaper metals such as copper.

There are plenty of doubts that the world is seeing a modern-day version, especially since there are multiple factors behind the surge in gold and Bitcoin. Moreover, premature warnings of an imminent debt crisis have been issued off and on ever since the Global Financial Crisis.

The freezing of Russian assets after its invasion of Ukraine highlighted the vulnerability of foreign currency holdings to external sanctions, increasing the allure of the yellow metal. Central banks have also been increasing their gold stockpiles to diversify their reserves.

And the crypto world is no stranger to purely momentum-driven booms and busts: The argument that Bitcoin functions as a harbor was undercut when it tumbled during the post-pandemic inflation surge along with other speculative assets and again in recent days as it swooned after increased trade tensions.

For all their recent wobbles, the greenback, euro and yen still dominate trade to banking systems and remain the anchor for trillions of dollars in daily transactions. Government debt also underpins collateral frameworks and the plumbing of the world’s financial system.

The surging US stock market also challenges the view, given foreigners will need dollars to trade, and despite Trump’s destabilizing shifts overseas investors have continued to increase their holdings of US Treasuries.

“Whoever thinks currencies and bonds are replaceable with bitcoin and gold needs a reality check,” said Shoki Omori, Tokyo-based chief desk strategist at Mizuho Securities Co., one of Japan’s biggest brokerages.

Omori thinks markets are just witnessing a “momentum trade,” in which more and more investors pile into a seemingly winning trade regardless of fundamentals.

What Bloomberg Strategists are saying...

“Debasement seemed a pretty rational way to describe the extraordinary market moves of recent months. But now that we’ve got a nice moniker for the trading regime we have been in, it’s perhaps a sign that everyone is skewed too much one way and we’re due some volatility and a shake-out.”

— Mark Cudmore, Executive Editor for Markets Live

Click here for more

But there are also solid reasons why investors are having the debate over debasement, even if it ultimately proves an academic one that doesn’t upend the market status quo.

Strategists at Eurizon SLJ Capital Ltd. reckon governments have become “addicted to deficit spending” thanks to the flood of cheap money witnessed in the financial crisis and pandemic as central banks slashed interest rates and hoovered up bonds.

“If the reserve managers continue to divest from not just the dollar but all fiat monies, gold could continue to march higher,” the Eurizon strategists wrote last week. “If central banks’ gold holdings match those of dollars, all else being equal, gold could reach $8,500. Why not?”

At Andromeda Capital Management, Alberto Gallo says as debts rise and populations age, the “process of monetary debasement” will accelerate as it’s easier for politicians to embrace that than ignite growth or impose austerity. He sees central banks risk being roped into the effort.

“Policymakers are toying with ideas of monetary reform, be it gold reserve revaluation, bank deregulation or changing central bank targets,” Gallo said in a report. “The end results are likely entrenched inflation, further fiat currency depreciation, higher long-end rates and positive risk-free risky-asset correlations.”

In the US alone, where the Fed has kept rates elevated to cool inflation by restraining growth, Trump moved fiscal policy in the opposite way with tax-cuts that are projected to add to the already nearly $2 trillion deficit. Debt could be almost double the size of gross domestic product by 2050, the Government Accountability Office warned in February.

Trump and his administration have also campaigned for the Fed to slash rates, in part because officials argue doing so would lower the cost of debt, and are testing the limits of the bank’s independence by trying to oust Governor Lisa Cook. The shifting trade war, the US government shutdown and the president’s use of the Justice Department to target his domestic foes have underscored worries about political dysfunction and unpredictability.

In France, investor angst rose again after Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornubecame the country’s fifth prime minister to resign in two years amid stalemate over the budget. Last week ended with him being reappointed.
As for Japan, Takaichi’s potential elevation to the premiership comes as the collapse of the decades-old ruling coalition increases doubt about the outlook. The pro-stimulus lawmaker’s victory in her party’s recent leadership election raises the prospect of slower rate hikes at a time inflation remains well above the central bank’s target.

Against such a backdrop, some still see room for the debasement trade to extend.

“This is how much the world has changed and it could be a sign that digital assets are becoming a more trusted source of value in the current environment,” said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB Ltd. in London. “We do not see this coming to an end any time soon.”



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/13/2025 10:01:25 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

zerohedge.com

"We're In Wars": Ray Dalio Warns Of 'Civil War' & Soaring Debt

BY TYLER DURDEN

TUESDAY, OCT 14, 2025 - 06:00 AM

One thing is for sure about billionaire Ray Dalio; something bad is coming, at some point - because there's just too much bad shit happening to reconcile. The Bridgewater founder has warned about a brutal AI war between the US and China (which Eric Schmidt recently echoed) and that the UK is in a 'debt death-spiral' (to moderate pushback), among other things.

[url=][/url]

Now, Dalio is warning that the U.S. may be entering a new kind of "civil war" amid rising inequality and debt, as well as a breakdown in the global geopolitical order. In an interview with Bloomberg TV which aired this week, Dalio said that the forces which "shape the world" were all now being disrupted, and that America served as a prime example of this.

"We're in wars. There is a financial, money war. There's a technology war, there's geopolitical wars, and there are more military wars," Dalio explained. "And so we have a civil war of some sort which is developing in the U.S. and elsewhere, where there are irreconcilable differences."

Dalio has this year issued several warnings about the risks posed by America's rising national debt, which currently stands at a staggering near $38 trillion. Additionally, the billionaire also highlighted the country's debt-to-income ratio of roughly 120 percent as potentially leading to a situation in which repayments sap government finances and trigger a "death spiral" for the economy.

Dalio reiterated warnings that US government debt is rising too quickly, fueling a climate “that’s very much analogous” to the years before World War II.

When debt rises relative to income, “it’s like plaque in the arteries that then begins to squeeze out the spending,” Dalio, 76, said in an interview with Leaders with Francine Lacqua that aired Friday.

The billionaire investor has long cautioned of the risks of spiraling US debt, contending last month that it’s posing a “threat to the monetary order.” He blamed politicians on both sides of the aisle and has called for a mix of tax-revenue increases and spending cuts to tackle what he calls the “ deficit/debt bomb.”

...

Debt held by the public amounted to 99% of US gross domestic product last year, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. That number is projected to reach 116% of GDP in 2034, higher than any point in US history.

Surging debt is just part of the problem, according to Dalio. Festering global conflicts and wealth inequality are also creating an environment with “plenty to worry about,” he said. - Bloomberg

On top of the debt, Dalio has sounded the alarm over Trump's tariffs, warning in April that the president's shifting policy is part of a broader set of economic and geopolitical pressures that could trigger a crisis "worse than a recession."

"I think that right now we are at a decision-making point and very close to a recession," Dalio told NBC's "Meet the Press." "And I'm worried about something worse than a recession if this isn't handled well."

"We have a breaking down of the monetary order. We are going to change the monetary order because we cannot spend the amounts of money. So we have that problem....We are having profound changes in our domestic order, how ruling is existing. And we're having profound changes in the world order. Such times are very much like the 1930s."

"I've studied history," Dalio added, noting that "this repeats over and over again."

Asked about the worst-case scenario, Dalio pointed to a potential breakdown of the dollar's role as a store of wealth, combined with internal conflict beyond the norms of democratic politics and escalating international tensions – potentially even military conflict.

"These breakdowns have occurred before," he said. "The existing monetary and geopolitical order began in 1945. These systems go in cycles, and I worry about the breakdown—particularly because it doesn't have to happen."

"That could be like the breakdown of the monetary system in '71. It could be like 2008. It's going to be very severe," Dalio said. "I think it could be more severe than those if these other matters simultaneously occur."

Dalio said history is shaped by five major forces: monetary cycles like credit and debt; internal political conflict; shifting global power dynamics; technological change; and natural disasters such as pandemics. In his view, all five are currently in play.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 3:27:16 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

bloomberg.com

China Hits Back at US on Shipping With Hanwha Curbs, Probe

By Weilun Soon and Serene Cheong
October 14, 2025 at 12:35 PM GMT+8
The Hanwha Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Photographer: Hannah Beier/BloombergChina has threatened further retaliatory measures against US curbs on its shipping sector, after sanctioning American entities of a South Korean shipping giant.

The Ministry of Commerce said Tuesday it was placing limits on five US entities of Hanwha Ocean Co., one of South Korea’s biggest shipbuilders. The company’s shares dipped as much as 8% in Seoul, their biggest decline in about two months.

The moves are a marked escalation in a long-standing dispute between the world’s two largest economies over maritime dominance. It comes after tensions between the US and China escalated in recent weeks as President Donald Trump threatened additional 100% tariffs on imports from the Asian nation in response to new Chinese export controls.

This week, retaliatory levies on American-owned ships arriving in China came into effect as a tit-for-tat move by the Xi administration, causing concern across the global maritime sector. Beijing’s new curbs forbids any individual and entity from doing business with the five companies.

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Transport said that it was conducting a probe into the impacts from the US Trade Representative’s Section 301 investigation into China’s maritime sector, and may implement retaliatory measures in due time.

That dispute has consequences for global economy, as vessels are involved in 80% of worldwide trade. Washington announced in April plans to curb China’s shipbuilding prowess even as it sought to build up American capabilities. That had forced Chinese yards to lose some market share, while Chinese shipping lines faced severe penalties for calling at US ports.

At the same time, South Korean shipbuilders have offered Washington sweeteners to help the US revive its shipbuilding sector. Hanwha Ocean was the first Korean yard to acquire an American one, and has been seeking to transfer some of that know-how to American shores.

The five firms curbed by China are Hanwha Shipping LLC, Hanwha Philly Shipyard Inc., Hanwha Ocean USA International LLC, Hanwha Shipping Holdings LLC and HS USA Holdings Corp.

Spokespersons for Hanwha Ocean in Seoul and Hanwha USA didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 3:30:33 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

bloomberg.com

Crypto Slump Continues as China Hits Back Against the US
Sidhartha Shukla
October 14, 2025 at 2:02 PM GMT+8
Cryptocurrencies continued to lose ground after a historic round of liquidations that triggered a sharp selloff over the weekend.

Bitcoin, the largest digital asset by market value, slumped as much as 2.9% to about $112,500 on Tuesday morning in London, while Ether fell more than 5% to just above $4,000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The slide came as China imposed curbs on the American units of Hanwha Ocean Co., one of South Korea’s biggest shipbuilders, hitting back against US measures against the Chinese shipping sector. Earlier, about $19 billion of leveraged crypto positions were liquidated in a brutal selloff that began October 10, after US President Donald Trump threatened China with harsher tariffs in response to new export controls.

Digital-asset markets briefly rebounded to pare losses on Monday, but most major tokens have now resumed their descent.

The weekend selloff represented a drastic reset for crypto. Investors pulled $756 million from US Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds on Monday, underscoring a sense of nervousness among traders.

“The market now enters a consolidation phase, one defined by renewed caution, selective risk-taking, and a more measured rebuilding of confidence across both spot and derivatives markets,” analytics firm Glassnode said in a note.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 3:59:46 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

bloomberg.com

European Stocks Drop on Renewed US-China Tariffs Concerns
Macarena Munoz Montijano
October 14, 2025 at 3:16 PM GMT+8

European stocks fell as China has threatened further retaliatory measures against US curbs on its shipping sector. Ericsson AB soared after the Swedish telecom equipment maker reported robust earnings.

The Stoxx Europe 600 Index dropped 0.8% by 8:15 a.m. in London. Autos and mining shares were among the biggest laggards, while telecom sectors outperformed.

Among individual movers, Ericsson gained 11% as the firm reported earnings that more than doubled from a year earlier after it sold its call-routing business Iconectiv. Michelin slumped 8.9% after the tiremaker issued a profit warning due to much weaker performance in North America.

Sentiment soured as China hit back at the US on shipping by imposing restrictions on American units of Hanwha Ocean Co., one of South Korea’s biggest shipbuilders. The moves are a marked escalation in a long-standing dispute between the world’s two largest economies over maritime dominance.

“The nervousness in the markets was increased by the recurring disagreements over tariffs and shows that the resulting security is fragile,” said Guillermo Hernandez Sampere, head of trading at asset manager MPPM. “A rapid agreement will be necessary in order not to jeopardize the market’s previous gains.”

European Luxury's Sales Growth to Speed Up Early Next Year

Source: Deutsche Bank

Note: Weighted sector average at constant FX

The earnings season will kick off later today, with JPMorgan Chase & Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. set to report third-quarter results. In Europe, the nascent rally in luxury stocks will be put to the test, as valuations are already back to demanding levels.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 4:04:25 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

zerohedge.com

What Is Everyone Else Doing: Market Positioning And Technicals Cheat Sheet

BY TYLER DURDEN

TUESDAY, OCT 14, 2025 - 11:32 AM

While positioning has undergone a thunderous reset in the past 48 hours, as a market that was extremely overbought heading into Trump's Friday tweetfest selloff has suddenly and violently reset to just about neutral (as both we and Morgan Stanley QDS explained)...

[url=][/url]

... traders are desperate for some insight into how everyone else is positioning after the washout for one simple reason: since fundamentals haven't mattered in this market in about 3 years and only technicals and positioning are relevant (much more so than economic data which is delayed due to the government shutdown but which is manipulated propaganda garbage to begin with, constantly revised in a way that suits whoever is in charge), suddenly nobody has any idea what to do, and sure enough, Goldman's US Panic Index soared from 5.7 to over 9...

[url=][/url]

... in one of the biggest 1-day increases on record.

[url=][/url]

To help the hordes of confused, overpaid portfolio managers, here is a handy, one-chart primer from the Goldman trading desk, breaking out the bank's most important positioning axes and technical metrics, including sentiment, institutional and hedge fund, systematic, retail, and derivative indicators.

The bottom line: while sentiment remains bullish it is far from euphoric on a consolidated basis (Goldman has it at 7 out of 10 in terms of overall length) with several pockets of the market crowded, but overall positioning is neutral at the index level as macro uncertainty picks up and earnings kick off.


For those not very pressed for time, here are some more positioning details:

1. Short trend has flipped to slightly more negative in a subset (roughly 20%) of global markets, with the remaining 80% more positive, and 100% of medium-longer term signals still positive. S&P short-trend became a touch negative below 6580, but is positive again intraday Monday. Overall coming into today, models expect a modest $18bn of global equity 1 week sales – predominately in US markets, though S&P reestablishing positive short trend would mitigate that – and a similar figure over the cumulative 1 month, so the baseline sales are not extending further currently, and with contributions from both CTA/trend followers and the vol-based investors. If the market rebounds and vol subsides, the selling would be even smaller, and conversely there is ample room to grow larger if downside continues, with length near an 8.5 out of 10. Short trend is positive by 1.7% in the median global market currently, while medium trend is somewhat further away at >5% below spot and near 6300 in SPX.

[url=][/url]

[url=][/url]

2. S&P gamma is generally pro-cyclical currently, and could exacerbate market moves for the time being as one risk factor. During Friday’s selloff dealers went from long being long ~$9b gamma to long ~$4b. The -$5b drop during a single trading session was the largest in 3+ years. Why does this matter? Dealers hedging activity will not dampen volatility as much as it has been as of late. In order to stay hedged (when dealers are long gamma) they buy underliers when prices fall and sell when prices rise which leads to tighter trading ranges and lower realized volatility. When dealers are short gamma (which they are not right now...they are just less long) the opposite occurs (sell into declines and buy into rallies, amplifying price moves).

[url=][/url]

[url=][/url]

3. NEIXCTAT (CTA trend following performance) became slightly positive on the year last week before Friday, the first time since February and after being down 12% in May. This was driven by the equity and commodity buckets lately, and could be challenged as one risk factor if equity performance faltered. Goldman expects CTA/trend followers to renew buying govt bonds (excluding JGB) led by the German 5-10 year sector, and round out their oil/energy selling in the next one week in the baseline scenario.

[url=][/url]

[url=][/url]

4. CFTC/COT data remains offline during the shutdown. In Goldman's overall desk observations last week, they observed hedge fund led US index selling, with new shorts somewhat greater than trimmed longs though both contributing, and the heaviest activity on Friday and proportionally heavier in Nasdaq. This is in addition to some overall selling the previous week during quarter-end. Activity in major European markets was relatively quieter last week, and Asian markets mixed, with Japan index buying (and JGBs selling) and China selling led by Friday given the headlines

[url=][/url]

5. Buybacks: The current blackout period will end Oct 24 (approx. 40% will be in open window after that). Corporates typically exit blackout ~1-2 days post earnings so companies will start to enter open window periodically starting mid October when earnings start.

[url=][/url]

6. Liquidity. Huge 1-day collapse, near the Liberation Day lows and among the lowest reading of the decade.

[url=][/url]

[url=][/url]

More in the full Goldman note available to pro subs.



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 4:52:53 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

... let us watch and deliberate after your session. Am agnostic as well/ regard to whether or not 'the BIG one is happening' - convenient if yes, no harm if no, am ambivalent. Perhaps another walk might help to clear thinking. Shall listen to the report, pretend to chew gum, and do another walkie

Hello Manus, afternoon hi-tea break, some articles to snack on and VLOGs to imbibe, and let us see what is where and in what shape, (1) bloomberg.com <<China Hits Back at US on Shipping With Hanwha Curbs, Probe>> (2) bloomberg.com <<Crypto Slump Continues as China Hits Back Against the US>> (3) bloomberg.com <<European Stocks Drop on Renewed US-China Tariffs Concerns>> (4) Message 35295359 <<What Is Everyone Else Doing: Market Positioning And Technicals Cheat Sheet>> (5) youtu.be <<Dollar>> (6) youtu.be <<port fee>> ... that be all the drinks and snacks

Please do note the degree of the Asia market closes




To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/14/2025 7:36:17 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<uh, scary. careful!>>

... something about FAFO fight-club

bloomberg.com

Europe Seeks Tough Response to China’s Minerals Restrictions

By Jorge Valero and Sanne Wass
October 14, 2025 at 4:47 PM GMT+8

Rare earth oxides.Photographer: Peter Kollanyi/BloombergEuropean Union officials called for strong measures against China after Beijing imposed fresh export restrictions on rare minerals used in computer chips and other advanced technologies.

“We should have a tough response,” said Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, whose country chairs the EU’s rotating presidency.

“We are the biggest trading bloc in the world, we have a lot of muscles,” he added, speaking to reporters on Tuesday ahead of a trade ministers’ meeting in Horsens, Denmark. “We need to flex those muscles.”

The gathering comes after China announced new rules last week requiring foreign firms to seek approval to ship products containing even trace amounts of Chinese rare earth materials. The new regulations explicitly target materials used to make certain computer chips and to power AI research with military applications.

The move has left EU officials fretting about major disruptions in crucial supply chains.

“I’m very concerned. And more than concerned,” Michal Baranowski, Poland’s deputy economic development and technology minister, told Bloomberg News. “This is, in some ways, the worst-case scenario of weaponizing our rare earths dependency.”

China’s Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

EU trade ministers will address the matter Tuesday as they discuss how tariffs, export controls and other trade tools are being exploited.

Already, Europe is seeing the potential ramifications of China’s actions. Dutch ASML Holding NV, the world’s only manufacturer of the most advanced semiconductors, is bracing for disruptions, Bloomberg News previously reported.

The fresh restrictions led US President Donald Trump to announce on Friday that he would impose an additional 100% tariff on China and place export controls on “any and all critical software.”

Rasmussen said he didn’t see the EU imposing its own retaliatory tariffs on China. But he and other officials stressed that the EU should explore a joint response with the US.

“This is an area where we have common interest with our friends in the US,” Rasmussen said. “That’s also why we should avoid a trade war with the US. If we stick together we could much better pressure China to act in a fair way.”

EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic told reporters that the Group of Seven nations should try to hold a video call soon to coordinate their actions on the matter. He also said he would ask for a videoconference with his Chinese counterparts next week.

The EU has been gradually toughening its stance on China in recent months. The European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, proposed a 50% tariff last week on foreign steel above a set quota to restrict imports and tackle global overcapacity driven by Beijing.

Meanwhile, the Netherlands invoked for the first time a 70-year-old law to seize control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia, aiming to ensure Europe retains unfettered access to its chips.

Baranowski said officials must “think about what Europe can do to both extract ourselves from the vulnerability, though we know that this isn’t easy.”

He added: “Until they pull back, we should take it as seriously as the analysis suggests.”

(Updates with request for comment to China’s Foreign Ministry in seventh paragraph.)

— With assistance from Philip Glamann



To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (217075)10/15/2025 5:46:54 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217588
 
re <<eh>> ... already 400 eyes, real time petrie dish, oops, I mean Pacific Ocean and all other nooks and crannies under watching, for rice harvesting