Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Surething who wrote (8362)	2/25/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: jhild	Respond to of 20981

Careful, Surething, you are awfully close to obstruction of justice. Subpoena could be in the mail already. :^)

To: Surething who wrote (8362)	2/25/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>But didn't Kenneth Starr in a previous life defend the Tobacco companies during the period when they all swore under oath that nicotine wasn't addictive. True or not, the above is an actual example of McCarthyism, a public smear of corruption by innuendo. In this country even guilty people have a Constitutional right to a defense (good thing for Clinton!). That does not make the defender guilty also. It has recently be revealed by the media that many of Clinton's lawyers have also defended tobacco. Btw, when Starr was doing his job there is no evidence that he hired investigators to undermine the government attorneys, that is however standard Clinton practice and that can be obstruction of justice. Heck, the Clintons know they must use any means, legal or otherwise, to defeat the ends of justice.