Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (28848)	2/25/1998 6:23:00 PM
From: StockMan	Respond to of 1573682

P, Re -- 10% slower on Winbench means its a 30% slower CPU, slower than a 200 MHz chip. Gimme a break. You and Madwell should get together, maybe drag Bert along and throw in Fuchi into the mix. I am due for some laughs. Stockman

To: Petz who wrote (28848)	2/25/1998 7:23:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1573682

Petz, all:<Covington, its 10% slower than an equivalent 266 Mhz pentiumII.> If we think about business (and we should), the numbers are: P-II-266-512k - 21.3 Winstones98, P-II-266-0k - 15.6 WS98 ---------------------------------- or drop of about 27% This is below K6-166 (15.9) or about as good as Pentium-MMX-166 (15.4) Configuration: Windows95 440LX for P-II, 430TX for P-MMX/K6 w/512k L2 cache, 64 MB SDRAM, Matrox Millenium PCI in 1024x768x16 mode Quantum Fireball 2.1 GB UDMA drive. Regards, Ali