Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robnhood who wrote (8399)	2/25/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

I'have raised no issue of Starr leaking anything. My very narrow point here is that Starr has subpoenaed those that he believes have floated stories, apparently true stories, about his people overstepping the rights of defendants. I believe in one case a judgement to the tune of $50K was awarded to a defendant deprived of their rights to legal counsel when they were being interrogated. It has relevance in how Lewinsky was initially pressured and interrogated. The floating of these stories somehow constitutes obstruction of justice. I am apparently fielding criticism because there are those here that agree that it is obstruction of justice. I find that position fascinating.