Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (217488)	11/2/2025 11:04:37 AM
From: carranza2	2 Recommendations Recommended By Riskmgmt SirWalterRalegh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217532

All the red ink, caps, bolden, incomprehensible (to me) Chinese characters, stylized language, bias-injected AI ‘intelligence,’ etc., doesn’t change the fact that an apples to apples comparison (here, the USD) shows without any doubt whatsoever that the NASDAQ 100, NVDA, etc., over time have been hugely better investments than gold, hugely better. It is absolutely not even close. The contrary suggestion is 100% male bovine manure. No, 200% manure. Gold has its place, to be sure. But a very, very minor one. I can lose the purchase price on the bulk of my NASDAQ stocks and still come out way better than if I had bought gold at the same time I bought the stock. And many pay dividends. Anyway, spread this ‘theory’ of yours as much as you wish. There are undoubtedly many who think you are correct. Good luck to them. They’ll need it.