Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Art of Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DinoNavarre who wrote (10640)	11/26/2025 1:03:05 AM
From: Sun Tzu	3 Recommendations Recommended By Arran Yuan Kirk © sixty2nds Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10701

I know these are the charges against nVidia. But I don't see enough evidence to support them. Maybe they are good at covering their tracks, but these accusations don't hold water from where I stand. What could be true, and would be very bad, is not if nVidia is another Enron, but that nVidia is another Boston Chicken. For those who don't know Boston Chicken was not a case of outright fraud. It was a case of vendor financing its clients, which by itself is not bad, but then BC did not cut its losses and call in the debt on its franchisees as a regular bank financing them would have done because (1) it would cut their revenue, albeit at a lower rate, and (2) it would end the high price stock crack cocaine they had been addicted to. This is a far more recurring problem than Enron. Xerox, GE, and many others have been caught with this, and in all cases it had a substantial and long term negative impact. So the real thing to worry about is, how dependent is nVidia on financing its clients such as Coreweave, and should they faulter, will they call in the chips, or will they extend a lifeline and double down instead of cutting their losses short.