Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Surething who wrote (8470)	2/26/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Surething, please read my just prior post before babbling on about bedrooms. You're quite right though, what goes on in Clinton's bedroom is not my business...BUT IT WAS THE BUSINESS OF THE COURT IN THE JONES' SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWSUIT, ACCORDING TO THE JUDGE OVERSEEING THAT CASE. THE JUDGE DID NOT GIVE CLINTON PERMISSION TO TELL "HIS VERSION" OF THE TRUTH, BUT ONLY "THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP ME GOD". IT'S INCREDIBLE TO ME THAT SUCH A SIMPLE MISSION COULD PROVE IMPOSSIBLE FOR OUR FEARLESS LEADER TO DELIVER UPON. IF OUR PRESIDENT IS LYING TO OUR FACES I DO IN FACT VIEW THAT AS MY BUSINESS. I'M SORRY THAT YOU WOULD PREFER TO BE LIED TO, AND WOULD ALSO PREFER THAT THE JUDGE IN THE JONES' SEXUAL HARASSMENT CASE ALSO DESERVES TO BE LIED TO. I BELIEVE IN TRUTH. IT'S TOO BAD OUR LEADER DOES NOT Good night.

To: Surething who wrote (8470)	2/26/1998 2:24:00 AM
From: Joe Btfsplk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Surething, seems to me that the "famous Canadian Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau" who "once said the State has no business in the bedrooms of its citizens" is not a very fine authority to cite. I mean, his only accomplishment was to boink an entire nation. Regards, George

To: Surething who wrote (8470)	2/26/1998 5:12:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 20981

Surething, I realize that all you want to fixate on is "Slick's Dick", but I for one am not interested in Presidential appendages. Go talk to your fellow libs about "Slick's Dick". You know, you should really think about getting counseling for such a morbid fascination with the President's sexual affairs. While Justice is attempting to determine whether or not Clinton lied under oath in his sexual harassment trial, the libs would rather talk about "Slick's Dick". No thanks.

To: Surething who wrote (8470)	2/26/1998 5:23:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20981

What a total bunch of unadulterated nonsense you wrote! You have not learned anything. Are you impervious to knowledge or just unable to process it? This is not about sex, it's about suborning perjury, obstruction of justice and lying, both under oath and directly to the American public. Glad that Starr and his quest for the truth makes you squeal. Better save your voice for the future, you have a lotta squealing ahead of you.