Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (8490)	2/26/1998 5:27:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 20981

Interesting that someone has already written of this concept. I've got so sick of the harsh accusations against Starr, I would be intensely interested in seeing the public's reaction to how the Clintons/Carville/et al would treat the new IC. In fact, since I love exposing liberal hypocrisy (it's so easy to do), I wouldn't mind at all if Starr were fired by Janet Reno. I still believe that the evidence thus far is such that a new IC would need to be appointed, and I would be willing to see how a new IC would do. One thing we can be sure: James Carville would make sure that any new IC would be no "pahtisan", because the Clinton administration abhors any suggestion of pahtisan viewpoints. It would have to be someone with an extreme sense of fairness and justice, with an interest in finding out the truth (that's what lady liberty is doing when she's holding the scale right, is attempting to divine the truth). DK