SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1577749)12/16/2025 4:58:43 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1587829
 
Texas is also a "donor" state,

That has been true for a while. Abbott hired some lobbyists to change that, though. Haven't heard about any successes, however. Like much of what Abbott spends money on, no one seems to know where it goes or what it does. It just seems to be spent.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1577749)12/17/2025 1:30:44 AM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1587829
 
I've looked at this topic many times. There is no standard for reporting these data; I state who finds it to their advantage can literally say anything they'd like.
For example, California has far more military installation, bases, etc., and far more people on those payrolls than any other. Vastly more than Texas even.

One could development an equitable comparison basis but it really doesn't service much propose; everyone just makes it up to suit their own purposes. An example is such analyses tend to ignore the fact that NY and CA charge massive state income taxes, which are then deductible on the federal tax return. But property in those states is massively more expensive than it is in TX or Arkansas, so taxapyers in Cali get far more federal deductions simply because your states are less affordable. How's that my problem?

The point is these are not factual claims, even though lots of people believe they are.