To: golfer72 who wrote (1579265 ) 12/23/2025 10:12:12 PM From: Maple MAGA 2 RecommendationsRecommended By
Read Replies (2) | Respond to Across much of the world, COVID-19 vaccine policies crossed a line from public health guidance into coercion , violating long-standing norms around individual rights, bodily autonomy, and informed consent.vaccine mandates tied to employment, travel, education, and basic participation in society , effectively forcing individuals to choose between compliance and their livelihoods. In many countries, people lost jobs, professional licenses, or the ability to cross borders, not because they were sick, but because they declined a medical intervention. This marked a sharp departure from established medical ethics, which hold that consent must be voluntary, free from pressure, and revocable .did not reliably prevent infection or transmission , but primarily reduced severe disease in high-risk populations. Nevertheless, low-risk individuals, including young adults, prior-infected individuals, and even children, were subjected to the same mandates as the elderly and medically vulnerable, with little acknowledgement of risk stratification or natural immunity .questioning policy was treated as misinformation , rather than a legitimate part of democratic oversight and scientific debate.precedent they set : that governments may compel medical procedures, restrict movement, or exclude citizens from public life based on compliance, even when the benefit is marginal or uncertain. Once such powers are normalized, they are rarely relinquished voluntarily.Pfizer alone reported roughly USD $37 billion in COVID-19 vaccine revenue in 2021 , contributing to tens of billions more over subsequent years, an outcome that understandably raises questions about incentives, influence, and accountability during a global crisis.
