SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T.K. Allen who wrote (7623)2/26/1998 11:37:00 AM
From: Robert L. Akers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10368
 
I'm wondering why the proposal to shift from biennial licenses to a
20% tax hasn't become part of the debate in the lege. It seems to me
that until it is, the orientation of the debate is whether the state
would be better off without the games than with the status quo. But
if the prospect of doubled revenues was on the other side of the
equation, well, all this is obvious. So why isn't it being openly
debated? It seems like serious brinkmanship to not start playing the
good cards at this point.

Larry


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News