Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (8575)	2/26/1998 4:21:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

>>I suppose you know that for a Fact. Close as you are to Clinton intimates. Could we try, just every once in awhile, not to go ideologically overboard? That observation, unattributed to be sure, has been made in many, many news stories and opinion columns. Many did confine it to "long time associates" not believing him, since only they would know his history. So I amend it to reflect that.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (8575)	2/27/1998 1:39:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

I guess I should amend my amendment back to my original: "Mr. Clinton's predicament was evident at several recent dinner parties and interviews," writes Wall Street Journal columnist Albert R. Hunt. "No one believed the president's explanation about his relationship with former intern Monica Lewinsky; terms like disgraceful, reckless and contemptible were tossed about -- all by prominent Democratic office holders and high-level Clinton appointees." And those are his fans talking.