Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (8584)	2/26/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Hello earthling BAP, As a radioactive blob of slime this is how I see it: Prez C, may or may not have been "serviced" by a young intern who worked for our Federal govm't. Some evidence certainly supports a "special relationship" ie Vernon as employment councillor extraordinaire (phone calls with updates to the Prez, fact that he asked Mon whether she had a sexual relationship with the prex and he asked the prez this, contacts with large companies to secure a job for the Mon, goodness, the UN wasn't good enough-why then of course, let it be Revlon.) All those visits, what was she up to? And the Trip trap family singer. Well, I know how Janice feels about her but it is still part of the evidence. And then there is the nefarious "talking points" paper. The gifts in Bety's possession don't look too good either. On the other hand, I don't care who the Prez is having sex with(or being blown off by- if indeed a BJ is not sex, wink wink bit of a nudge) as long as it is off the job. Using his interns, if he did, would not only be sexual harassment but just plain stupid and I don't like to think of our Prez as being that big of a dummy (not saying he isn't- just saying I don't like thinking that).

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (8584)	2/26/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

I believe, as I've said all along, that Starr's legal remedies are inappropriate. Yet again: whom the Prez screws has nothing to do with Whitewater. And should not, therefore, be part of Starr's enquiry. Just for a moment imagine yourself on trial for one thing, and then being subjected to an examination of your entire life in the hope that some dirt'll come up. Clinton's a public figure, and of course he runs a risk greater than ours, but as we've seen, any woman who's ever known him is coming under the microscope (um, edit here: oops, waht a turn of phrase...). This is sick.