Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (4245)	2/26/1998 9:06:00 PM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 27968

Hey, LE, what are you planning for an encore to that? Yelling fire in a crowded theater? TG

To: Little Engine who wrote (4245)	2/26/1998 9:11:00 PM
From: skreiger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Let's face it, folks. Jamie's tale of woe is certainly plausible and unfortunate. But his words ring true. This stock is a "crap shoot". THAT'S WHY IT'S STILL A BB STOCK! We're looking at a company which just went public this year. The leadership has been highly aggressive and opportunistic in their attempts to grow the company into something which will someday leave the shady world of BB stocks and emerge onto one of the major exchanges as a profitable reporting company. If you are not willing to wager on the risk-reward opportunities this stock provides, then by all means, take your money and put it in a nice safe mutual fund. I can't understand why some folks believe that everything about this company should be done only to THEIR specifications. I have invested my money (and time doing DD) in FAMH and at this point am as comfortable as I have ever been with my decision. I have communicated with Mr. Monas on a number of occasions and have always received a quick and straight-forward response. I'm comfortable with that. On a number of occasions I have had to take a step back and evaluate my decisions about this company. Each time, I remind myself to look at the big picture and not to sweat too many of the details. This company is profitable. It has actual offices with actual employees and actual clients signing actual contracts. They have been extended a $12MM line of credit. They have aggressively acquired other companies in an effort to grow the company. They have begun a stock buyback program. When I look at most other BB stocks, those characteristics are generally not present. Often there is no product, no profit, plenty of hollow promises, and a long list of caveats. I'm sure there are many who will read this post and write me off as a starry-eyed sucker. That's fine -- your opinions aren't going to change my opinions, so don't bother me with them. I'm long on FAMH and still have no problem getting a good night's sleep. Regards to all, Scott

To: Little Engine who wrote (4245)	2/26/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: Jonathan Lebed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

It's amazing that, that supposed ISP once entered the FAMH chat room with the handle "Little Engine". Either Jamie Orr uses the name "Little Engine" in the FAMH Chat Room or Little Engine is Jamie Orr. It also makes sense that you wrote that since you have posted in 3 hours. Plus, the 2 styles are very simliar. Besides...if you were copying an email..the message wouldn't look like that. Nice Try LE. You can't fool us with your bashing attempts...anyway, 99% of that message was BS. Stop trying to make a fool out of yourself. Jon

To: Little Engine who wrote (4245)	2/26/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 27968

>>I'm sending this through Little Engine because I believe he will post it. Cheryl only posts the positive comments I send her.<< Thanks, Jamie, for a most interesting post. A lot to ruminate on. I guess some of the Yea-sayers on the thread don't want this sort of thing getting around!

To: Little Engine who wrote (4245)	2/26/1998 11:17:00 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Respond to of 27968

Little Engine/Jamie Orr, I feel your pain. Now, Little Engine, to make it fair, how about posting some of the "happy" FAMH shareholder email I am sure you have recieved! It is my belief that over the course of the pastmonth or so Ira Monas has probably been inundated (sp? Andrew?) with requests, emails, faxes and telephone calls from shareholders and others either upset with him or seeking more information from him. How would you feel if you were the President trying to run the company and increase shareholder value when every Little Engine and Joe bothers him with silly requests and gets on his case for stuff?? Next thing you know, he will need a bodyguard. Unbelieveable! Have some candy, and sorry to hear about your unpleasant experience with the company, Jamie Orr. I find it pretty difficult to stomach the fact that you say you sold 69,000 shares at a loss just because of what you feel as incompetence (sp? Andrew) on Ira Monas's part when the stock is poised for a move up and with the scheduled release of positive Audited Numbers on Monday...or Tuesday...or Wednesday. Jane