Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shorty who wrote (5860)	2/28/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: tanoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Hello Scott err shorty; Let me re-appraise the game for you since you have many of the players all in the wrong position?? First off, PDG is sitting in the stands only watching, because at this point they have no more say in the legal proceedings!...look it up! GLR, hmmm they are presently the focus of an investigation into possible, illegalities in the awarding of their rights....in other words theirs have been suspended......they did not make it through the 30 day process after gazzetting......I guess you missed this minor detail? The game at the moment is between KRY the MEM and the CVG, being presided over by the SCJ, of which they have declared title on three previous occasions as belonging to Inversora Mael(KRY). It amazes me to see people such as yourself to easily eliminate information that has a bearing on this situation. The fact that they "HAVE" title means in effect that the worst case scenario for KRY is that they have "won", Ambassador Paris has taken the place of Ruiz, think long and hard about this bit of information, it points to what you will find to be the way?? Also if you care to look, the Venezuelan Gov has started the process of privatizing the CVG?? The CVG are the only defenders of the deal between them and PDG, and guess what at this point in the legal proceedings they haven't got a say in it either.....look it up? As for your statement that you will have plenty of opportunities to cover, that will remain to be seen, to cover you must have shares that are offered, and the chances are they won't be there. On a positive ruling you will be bidding against a number of fund company's that are presently waiting for a positive ruling to buy on the open market, with six million shorts, you will be very pressed to cover, so don't even try to deny that little fact, the market works on supply and demand, and "if" the ruling is positive, there won't be much offered between $15-20 dollars, so who now has taken on more of the risk???? Keep pressing, you are getting better, and short some more on Monday, you will only help the cause,I really like what I see?? With regards,Frank P.S.It will be interesting to see how your "Holdings" make out in the end?, I will be here either way, will you?? P.P.S. I guess you and your boys have conveniently missed the fact that at present KRY's deep rights have been officially gazetted, and are going through their 30 day legal process at the moment....GLR didn't get through!! P.P.P.S. And why can't six million shorts be wrong, if they have only believed one source, after all you people doubt all of our sources, we have always been able to produce information, I doubt if any of you have even really gone through it all, none of you have believed what Roy Carson has said, so do so at your own peril, I have learned a great deal through him, I had my doubts at first, it is easy to have doubts when one first looks at his web site, it is rather colourfull, but with time everything he has stated has come to light, so you had better give him more credit and weight to what he has to say?

To: shorty who wrote (5860)	2/28/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: Fulvio Castelli	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

How do I loathe thee, let me count the ways: 1. Over 6 million shorts can't be wrong. First of all, it isn't 6 million shorts, it is 6 million shares that are short. Although, since the vast majority of these shorters are retail, you may be right after all. Ever hear of a company called Dell Computer? A full 30% of this company's shares were short before it ran big time (I think it doubled). Yes idiot, 6 million short shares CAN be wrong. 2. I can cover my position ad infinitum. This statement is almost as stupid as the one made by that intellectual giant Peter Moss when he tried to tell us to hedge our long position by going short. If you think you can cover a short position 'ad infinitum' you are truly delusional. I think even your shorter friends on this forum will agree on this point. 3. I personally think KRY is over valued even if they owned all the concessions at Las Christinas and were mining it. Has it even entered that snail-quick pea-brain of yours that there is a good possibility of a major BUYING LC from KRY in the (more than likely) eventuality that they win? What would that do to your evaluation lameoid? I love this! First the shorters tell us that KRY doesn't stand a chance in hell of winning this court case and now, when it seems that they will indeed win, suddenly LC is worthless! Jesus, talk about delusional! 4. Most buying has been retail and wide spread. Institutional shorting is however big. You are a total moron. You have got this EXACTLY backwards (but I would expect nothing less from one of your supreme ignorance). When a brokerage house was recently asked why they weren't allowing their institutional investors to short KRY but were allowing their retail clients to do so, want to know what their response was? "This is what they're there for." Fodder. Grist for the mill. 5. Reality always reflects value eventually. Yes and reality will make sure to reflect that your value goes to zero (or significantly less) in 'short' order. This is called 'evolution' (have your mommy explain this concept to you if you don't understand). The human gene pool tends to eradicate its congenital idiots. *Spitting Bull: I know, I know!! Stooping!! Yada-yada-yada.* Ciao.

To: shorty who wrote (5860)	2/28/1998 8:42:00 PM
From: R Langford	Respond to of 10836

Well Shorty I think I will sell you a few of my shares later in the week. Hope you enjoy them as much as I have. Bob

To: shorty who wrote (5860)	2/28/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: tanoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Hello shorty,or may I call you Scott??; Just for you.....A collection of news from Roy Carson, in the Crystallex journey from summer of 1997 to present Word leaks out of gold at Las Cristinas, 25,000,000 oz's/au; gemdisc.co.uk After the July 15/th ruling in which PDG/CVG claimed victory, Crystallex response was; gemdisc.co.uk Secret Meetings??? vheadline.com The World Bank??? vheadline.com.ve The CVG in a scandal???.....really, no way!!....just how could that be?? vheadline.com.ve Albino!!.........comment ca va?? vheadline.com.ve Gold reserve is a company I follow and like but?? vheadline.com.ve What happened to the "LOCK"?? vheadline.com.ve Funny ingredients for soup?? vheadline.com.ve What is this, Crystallex are "pioneers"?? vheadline.com.ve Is the end really at hand?? vheadline.com.ve High powered plans and more plans?? vheadline.com Irregularities.......where?? vheadline.com Las Cristinas, you look so good to me?? vheadline.com May I suggest that you study the next ones very carefully, they are very important to this case?? Why does this guys name sound so familiar??..wonder if he is any relation to that other guy?? pages.prodigy.com Sorry, but back to the future we go?? crystallex.com For more, if you still feel inclined go here? geocities.com geocities.com Well isn't this special, for a Saturday night?? crystallex.com.news Great one for the legal beagals, mine likes it?? stockhouse.com Hope you enjoy yourself, and by the way, there is so much more?? With regards,Frank