Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (9010)	3/1/1998 12:36:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

>>but they can still prosecuted you for some things, if they want. Only for things not covered in her testimony or if she lies and thereby commits an additional crime. >> That's the reason for Monica's displeasure: she wanted full immunity and he wouldn't give it to her because, it seems, she wouldn't say that Clinton had told her to lie about their relationship. The reason Monica won't get full immunity is because she cannot be trusted to tell the truth once it is granted, something clearly evident ever since Ginsburg appeared on the scene. Limited and use immunity keep her in continuing legal jeopardy if she fails to tell the full truth. >>My understanding is that they can force you to accept limited immunity, as they did with Lewinsky's mother. No, not so. You take the 5th and then get use immunity or a comtempt citation and jail time ala Susan McDougal. Btw, isn't it interesting that we just find out that Walter Kaye, Monica's NY benefactor and Clinton bankroller, is in effect paying Susan McDougal to keep quiet by paying her bills? Remember that McDougal was convicted by Starr and has not yet served that sentence and I believe she has also been convicted as an embezzler in California and has not yet served that sentence either. Her only hope against years in prison is a pardon.