SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike McFarland who wrote (14530)3/1/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: Bonnie Bear  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18056
 
Mike: good question. When I started working in 1980, and quite a few years after, nobody, but nobody, wanted stocks- except utility stocks, for the yield- and the prudent person wasn't interested. And lots of studies have shown that just saving more money and owning a house as a hedge against inflation gets a person to the same place.
I'm new in the market after half a life of investing in real estate instead of stocks. Stocks are like spices- too many spoils the dish, all you need is just a little bit of really good ones to make a difference. The stock market, or owning a small business, makes a lot more people wealthy than working for a big employer. People have lost sight of the "buying the business" part of the stock market, they're gambling now.
I approach it the old-fashioned way- I am buying a part of a small business that I expect to grow very large, and I am risking my money in hopes that it will make me wealthy. The folks that really make money buy in when the business is very very small. So I am picking out a handful of microcaps (companies less than $500M in market cap) that have the potential to grow large. example: FSN, only $80M market cap, is a real-estate investment trust backed by Franklin Resources, selling below book value: at 1.5 book value and 5X expansion in asset growth I have a ten-bagger down the road with a huge dividend. OTCM is filled with little microcap companies- they just fill their coffers with itty bitty dull boring companies growing at 15% a year to keep the fund owners smiling in Peter Lynch style.
Here's a couple of fund managers that really have a great approach..they are constantly looking for great values no matter what is happening to the market. Best of class I have found is roycefunds.com for microcaps and muhlenkamp.com for largecaps, they proudly show their performance during bear markets, have been managing money since the early 70s and are superb bottom-fishers. If you do nothing else just scoop up that 2000/year allowed for your IRA and hand it to them.
I think most people don't realize the power of having a kitty of money free of taxes...the main thing is to get your tax-free trading/investing kitty as large as possible, get everything you can into that tax-free category as it really does make a huge difference down the road, probably more of a difference than on what you invest it in. Taxes are icky :-(



To: Mike McFarland who wrote (14530)3/1/1998 5:53:00 PM
From: Investor2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18056
 
RE: "Should a young person, who is mainly committed to saving rather than investing, having time on his side, simply chuck the idea of being in stocks?"

It is my opinion that a young person should develop an investment/savings plan that includes regular (e.g., monthly) contributions to a wide range of financial instruments, including, at a minimum, stocks, bonds, and savings/money market accounts. The younger that person is, the greater percentage he should invest into stocks. Never invest everything in stocks.

Just my opinion,

I2



To: Mike McFarland who wrote (14530)3/1/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Jack Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18056
 
Mike,

>>I am ever
waiting for a market correction to
buy into equities.


Yeah, I've been waiting for that correction since about Dow 4000, where the market was "overvalued". No one knows how far a mania can go or how large a bubble can be inflated. Even in a "new era".

Sympathetically,

Jack