SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (49176)3/2/1998 3:38:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Re: Nomai Tests

I think it's obvious (based on the injunction ruling) that the judge thought Iomega's "test" results were as dubious as I do. I eagerly await Nomai's own scientific tests to be presented in a court of law.
Don't forget, part of the judge's ruling lifting the injunction was stated to the effect of Zip drive failure did not need the presence of Nomai discs to occur. The drives and discs failed even with Iomega Brand discs only.



To: Cogito who wrote (49176)3/2/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: stock bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Allen, didn't the judge say that the test were conducted under adnormal conditions, like elevated temperature, and that IOM didn't show what the affects of the tests would be under normal usage? Therefore, the judge ruled in favor of Nomai.

Stock Bull


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News