Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OtherChap who wrote (2593)	3/2/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: slipnsip	Respond to of 18444

"the only thing that kept this stock from hitting 20 cents today is that the wired articles havnt show up on the newswires, so only websurfers no what's going on. there's no chance in hell the company will issue any kind of press release denying these charges, because it will only draw attention to the article that they hope people havnt seen!" I couldnt agree more with your last post..

To: OtherChap who wrote (2593)	3/2/1998 5:50:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Respond to of 18444

Oh, did I strike a nerve, mentioning WIRED? Oops, my bad.

To: OtherChap who wrote (2593)	3/2/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: ClearSky	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 18444

Although I haven't done much posting, I have been following NETZ for the past few months and fortunately got out with some semblance of a profit this a.m. Aside from that, I reread prior Wired articles that mentioned Zulu and Softbank and compared them with today's releases. Is it just me, or does anyone else find the following unusual: ... from the Jan. 6, 1998 Wired article entitled ZULU-TEK BLITZES INTO CROWDED AD SALES ARENA: "Neufeld and other analysts praised Zulu-tek's purchase of 65 percent of Softbank Interactive Marketing for an undisclosed sum. Jim Nail of Forrester Research said that Zulu-tek is 'putting together a portfolio of different advertising companies, and I expect there to be more acquisitions in the near future to achieve more synergies.'" compared to the Mar 2, 1998 Wired article entitled PART II: MATING 'A POODLE WITH A DEAD HIPPO'? "Softbank Interactive was hard to sell," says Jim Nail, an analyst at Forrester Research. Jupiter Communications analyst Evan Neufeld agrees, and elaborates. "If other direct competitors had the opportunity, but didn't buy them, then that's a little weird," he says. "Maybe there's not much that's compelling under the hood." ... I'm not in the internet industry...are Forrester Research and Jupiter Communications industry heavyweights? Seems wishy washy at best (??? at worst) to "praise" a transaction then develop a strongly opposing opinion soon after. JeanneK