SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald L. Kerr who wrote (12165)3/4/1998 10:32:00 AM
From: biffpincus  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 31646
 
Here is the portion of thestreet.com article that deals with TAVA.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The Motley Fool and Silicon Investor favorite Tava (TAVA:Nasdaq) --
prevously known as ToPro -- continues to be the only player in the Y2K
embedded systems market. And while a number of other industry analysts
and CEOs quietly wonder what the company is up to, the company's stock
is rallying (closing Tuesday at 8 5/16).

CEO John Jenkins spoke in very vague terms about the company's "more
than 35" clients, calling them "a major food processing company" or "a
leading soft drink company." But in explaining the Tava business model, it increasingly sounds like Tava provides very little bang for the buck. Essentially, what the company offers is a list of devices that won't work after 2000 -- Tava doesn't fix them, it doesn't replace them, but it will tell you what doesn't work.

Tava sends out people to the factory floor to do an inventory, the Tava crew jots down some serial numbers and model numbers, and, according to Jenkins, "we send that inventory to our database of 12,000 items for suspects."

And then what happens? "Then," says Jenkins, "we create a paper
compilation that is a status of the inventory."

You see, now I'd just call that a report and I couldn't see how that
process would justify a $140 million market cap -- but I guess that's
why I'm not qualified to be a Year 2000 CEO.