Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Loki who wrote (19280)	3/4/1998 3:38:00 PM
From: Roads End	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

The way I see it is the lack of guidance is what has everyone spooked. This morning's dowery article was an attempt to guide without violating these silly quite rules. Threads and rumors are made for taking advantage of situations just as this.

To: Loki who wrote (19280)	3/4/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: Windseye	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 97611

Loki, Well, down here in my rowboat, things are looking grim with only one oar left... I just seem to be going around in circles! What is that sheet of white on the horizon? After our analysis of the other day, after reading ALL of the articles referred to here, after noticing all the negative comments by analysts and brokers, after noticing that NO ONE has published any additional FACTS, it becomes clear that "someone" wants or is happier with the price being lower. Perhaps the question is, "How much lower does 'someone' want it?" Is this amorphous group or wispy individual going to happy with $25? Perhaps $20? It's clear that it's moving for no clear reason... I wonder if it's possible to figure out WHO GAINS by the price being so low? Doug