Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (9688)	3/4/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

Last time I looked Monica is a target of a Grand Jury investigation. Starr's subpoena is trying to exactly look through her conversations with her attorney in reference to events or actions that may or may not incriminate her. The right to avoid self-incrimination seems to me at least to be in the constitution. Perhaps your copy has conveniently removed this right. Conversations with attorneys representing your interests have traditionally been considered privileged. I am at a loss to see how this has anything to do specifically with the invocation of Executive Privilege that you have just argued against. I suppose then that you think the end does justify the means.