SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Triluminary who wrote (9715)3/4/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: jhild  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
I guess I just don't see the Independent Counsel Law as defining of the right of the investigative process that grand juries have. Scope yes, but not process. Certainly there is irony in the fact the newer version of the law was passed under the Clinton Administration, and I would agree that it may well be a form of ironic justice if he is brought down by it.

But I am surprised that you don't see this pursuit as becoming excessive, when they start fishing into areas that begin to abridge all of our rights.



To: Triluminary who wrote (9715)3/5/1998 1:34:00 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 20981
 
Former Clinton counsel Lanny Davis was on Nightline and he said that he and other Dems wrote and then supported the IC statute when it was applied against Republican presidents. But now that there is a Dem president, he sees flaws.

So the construct is that IC is good against Reps and bad against Dems. Shocking how brazenly transparent they are, is it not?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News