Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (9722)	3/4/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: Triluminary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Triluminary, at this level with respect to firing Ken Starr, I think it is hardly a legal issue, so much as it is political. It is clearly a legal issue. If Starr has overstepped his bounds, if he has abused his powers, if he has broken the law then it is Reno's DUTY to remove Starr and I would back her 100%. Reno is bound by the law and sworn to uphold it. If she does not uphold the law then she should be replaced. That she has not been replaced or fired Starr is a crystal clear indication that Starr has NOT overstepped his bounds regardless of what the main stream press is pushing. Of course firing Starr for just cause or no cause would have political ramifications. On that we agree. ;)