SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (3796)3/5/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: mister topes  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 42834
 
On a recent visit to Las Vegas I was told by a sports guru
to bet the ranch on the Denver Broncos in the Super Bowl
because John Elway would have the game of his life. The
pick was Denver as an 11 point underdog and the reason
was Elway's greatness. Well, I bet the ranch on Denver and
guess what. The guru was totally right about his pick of
Denver as a great 11 point underdog bet since they made it
close and easily won with the 11 point cushion in hand.
However Elway played like a jokester and was pathetic.
Am I mad at the guru for giving me such a great pick on
Denver because Elway played poortly. Why should I be?
I cashed the winning bet for bigtime bucks because the guru
made the right pick. I feel the same way about Brinker's
recommendation to sell New Asia on July 11 at 9.15 before
the meltdown. When he was in Rochester New York he told the
audience "I had no way of knowing there would be a meltdown
but if you want to give me credit for it I'll take it".
Everybody laughed heartily at Brinker's joke. If they could
see the ridiculous posts of RIllinois, Dippy et al, they
would undoubtedly laugh just as loud at these buffoons.
I have never read or heard Brinker take credit for predicting
an Asian meltdown. But then again, why should he, since he
got everybody out on July 11 BEFORE the meltdown. I like that.