Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (9932)	3/6/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

in your mind, perhaps. it may be simply a question of semantics, but in these particular references, all too often, the nuances of meaning call into play wide latitude which becomes the basis for disparity...

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (9932)	3/6/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Respond to of 20981

Is anyone surprised to learn that David Kendall, Clinton's personal attorney, represents the National Enquirer? Or that there have been efforts by that august journal to report dirt on Starr? Meanwhile, the Enquirer pays out $7,000 to a Julie Steele for a photo of Kathleen Willey -- days after Steele decided to recant the account she gave Newsweek confirming Willey's version of the lascivious treatment she received at the hands of one President Clinton -- and no one questions the credibility of Steele's recanting. Wasn't it Gennifer Flowers who went unbelieved because a tabloid gave her money? spectator.org