Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shane forbes who wrote (10676)	3/6/1998 11:15:00 PM
From: Moonray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Couple stories right up your alley: herring.com herring.com o~~~ O

To: shane forbes who wrote (10676)	3/7/1998 12:55:00 AM
From: DWB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

Shane, thanks for the great article... I'm going put a link to it on the Ericsson thread. If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times... the "religious" fanatics can debate GSM vs. CDMA until they're blue in the face, I just want to make money. Both systems will almost certainly make a large amount of money in wireless telecom., but every credible estimate I've seen shows GSM continuing to have a larger installed base for at least the next 5 years. Fact: companies producing GSM systems are making LOTS of money... NOW. Strongly indicated: companies producing GSM products will continue to make LOTS of money in the near (1-5 year) term. Conclusion: if LSI makes a GSM chip that is desired by the GSM manufacturers, they should make a LOT of money. Secondary effect: if LSI makes a lot of money, my shares should be worth a lot more. Tertiary effect: if my shares are worth a lot more, I am not going to care who won the battle for wireless telecom supremacy, because my portfolio will have won the war. DWB