Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (36297)	3/7/1998 6:04:00 PM
From: Nemer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58727

Pat: as I'm feeling inclined toward thejusticeontherange stage of my personna this rainy afternoon in Texas----- ----> Pythagoras (the machine with the stored data) shows the same close as Euclid, which is the machine that is currently up and running off a live feed. heckfar-----down here in rural country, we tend to name our beasts of burden with more esoteric types of nomenclature....... Pythagoras would prolley be handled with Pithy Euclid would def be called Eucly I tried to go back and get your other boxes names, but time has put them out of easy reach...... Matter of fact, you'd be Paddy.........gggg Keep on keeping on, ol son. I enjoy your posts. I really do, and I learn from them . ----->Found out why I was losing so often at gin. I went out with some of the "A" players last night and they showed me how one guy, that I lose virtually all the time to, cheats. down here, even in the CC set . them folks end up on the short end of the stick...... several methods of remedy come to mind.......all time tested and proven reliable..... 1) get several players to gang up on him and take him to the cleaners with a "set up" deal MORE than once 2) whop the sht out of him 3) whop the sht out of him and let him know why 4) whop the sh*t out of him and let the rest of the CC know why 5) string him up 5) all of the above....... This could be known as frontier justice and maybe unknown on the more civilized Eastern Seaboard, where some players know about it and allow it to contiune.......ggggggg Regards---Nemer

To: Patrick Slevin who wrote (36297)	3/7/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

patrick...you missed everything I am pointing out i said on quotecom there was NO TRADE it showed 0 but it showed 1042 at 17:21 EST Friday whereas when it trades it shows 1 I dont claim that Globex trades on friday night...what I do say is this My whole point is that the CME site is confusing..(and yes when you go to the site on the URL that I found...it doesnt clarify what trades on Friday night and what doesnt ...so if you hit that part and cant find the other...you are still confused) it doesnt even agree on when globex ends trading...you claim 800...CNBC and Bloomberg claim 815 ...you say Bloomberg and CNBC are wrong... and CME says 800 AND 815... My whole point is the indication is 1042....if globex ends up dropping on the futures for SP8H and ND8H sunday then this indicator has validity with quote com IF it trades around the close...then it doesnt... because the quote.com number is close to the close of the globex as of 3:25 CST on CME WHICH IS AFTER THE CLOSE...I am telling people not to get confused about the numbers...I had no idea if there was trading til 3:25 on Globex on friday....I had no idea when the info came out from CPQ..and maybe it was before the time indicated on quote.com for that quote and before 3:25 CST.. and when I saw info that was almost identical for an indication of a close of the Sp8H on CME Globex and quote.com end of day (both around a 15 point drop from fridays close) it confused me...DO YOU GET IT???? I am not an expert... THATS IT.... there are some people out there that do get confused and arent experts like you and even the web site is confusing..thats great that you are an expert.... but I still dont know when the futures end in the morning... I guess I will write CME and see if mark haines and Bloomberg are wrong and you are right....I guess you are right since you are the expert..but I would like independent clarification since there are conflicting pieces of data... btw, CME conflicts with your data ...1057.20 is the settlement price...Quote. com show settlement price as well...