Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (204)	3/8/1998 2:27:00 AM
From: Mitch Blevins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1614

marcos - help me out here.... by "wrong", you mean that he had some facts wrong, or that he was unnecessarily personal? ~Mitch

To: marcos who wrote (204)	3/9/1998 7:00:00 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1614

Marcos,,, The only time I was warned by Jill was when I posted the F word 3 times in a post to find out what was required to get hoofed. This was in response to Big Dude getting the boot on Bre.x,, once again it was done to a person who I admired and by people who had their own agenda in having him removed. Secondly, it was the last line in this post which drew me into a trap that I sincerely regret, Message 3443535 I wish to sincerely apologize to all who were somehow involved in that calumnity.... Surething, the post in question for you, well you got my opinion on that 1 or 2 posts later..I still like Dunc,, however I have not really disagreed with him so I'm not sure what it feels like.. Janice,, although I disagreed with her,, I found her very funny, and cannot possibly see a reason for her banishment.... As far as the SHUT UP post, Mitch was right, it was also meant to elicit some humour or at least a "NO,YOU SHUT UP" contraryairryman