SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (30500)3/8/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Stoctrash  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50808
 
All depends on your investment horizon.
Hind sight is beautiful though isn't it...

RE: Against the box;
I think they are right....or at least it made it a much less attractive strategy. I forget.

Even worse on this INTC thing is that CUBE's CEO is formerly from INTC. So do you really think he's even talked to people at AMD or NSM about ANY chip deal to go along side their Pentium copies? I'd bet, "NO FRICKEN WAY".

IR#4, you have your first public question;
AMD, NSM, etc, ARE THEY TABO WORDS AT THE OFFICE?
PLEASE HAVE MR. HAGEDORN READ THIS ALSO:
Message 3642374



To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (30500)3/8/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: CPAMarty  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50808
 
Shorting against the box is not illegal, however, unless you follow some cumbersome rules this technique no longer defers tax on the gain on your long position. In other words in most cases you will trigger the gain in your long position the minute you go short against the box


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News