To: Ken Todd who wrote (7401 ) 3/9/1998 12:58:00 PM From: Ken Todd Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8012
Just one more from Essary...for the benefit of those of you who have not felt the wrath of Essary's pen: Subject: Re: Ken Todd?! PLEASE SEND INFO IMMEDIATELY. Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 12:10:43 -0500 (EST) From: Trafalmadore <nymg@pipeline.com> To: ddotnek@bellsouth.net CC: cigars97@bellsouth.net "=== Ken, if you have no attorney, which is what I am assuming you are indicating, he will be directly in touch. You had plenty of opportunity to raise any questions or issues with me, and your response indicates that you are deliberately and with aforethought publicly posting libelous information about me. You have been given an opportunity to remove that; you have been given an opportunity to dialogue with me about it; you have defamed me without any regard for truth or an opportunity to get at the truth; so you know or should know what has been posted is inaccurate, misleading, fallacious and libelous. You have damaged my reputation and the reputations of my minor children and family. If you have any questions which would lead you to immediately remove yourcomments, please feel free to contact me. The information you have posted is untrue, and misleading, and you know that to be the case. You, instead,were in a position to know the true facts and you did not take thatresponsibility seriously, and have thus damaged me, and others, all of whom suffered significant losses due to your failure to act in a responsible manner. Otherwise, you will be contacted in due course via the appropriate legal channels. This represents my final demand that you removed any comments about me. I am not a public person, never posted publicly, and thus am not fair game for public commentary. In addition, your comments are per se libelous and subject to treble damages inasmuch as your response indicates malice." _________________________________________________________________ NOTE: Again, it was unsigned; maybe it was written by Retorik or Mohamed? (Perhaps they're reciprocating for the Press Release(s) he wrote for them when they were running [the scam],GIFS). BTW I'm getting a little bored with all of his threats; I am not responding to this. I believe any response only fuels his delusions of grandeur. It's a shame that the $1.98 he spent on the "You Too, Can Be a Laywer in Only 4 Easy Lessons!" correspondence course did not included lessons on ethics and the penalties for making threats of suit; his threats and accusations are groundless. Let him call 1 (800) SUE THIS. Ken Todd