To: Matt Webster who wrote (38693 ) 3/10/1998 4:09:00 PM From: Glenn D. Rudolph Respond to of 61433
Sun rebounds on positive analyst comments Reuters Story - March 10, 1998 15:15 %DPR %ENT %US %HOT %RCH SUNW CPQ INTC V%REUTER P%RTR SAN FRANCISCO, March 10 (Reuters) - Shares of Sun Microsystems Inc rebounded from a sharp drop Monday, after analysts said Sun is not likely experiencing the same problems as Compaq Computer Corp with its server business. Monday, Sun's shares tumbled 4-31/32 to 37-25/32, in an overall technology rout after Compaq warned Friday that it would only report break-even earnings in the first quarter, citing in part, aggressive price cuts in servers. Salomon Smith Barney analyst John Jones raised his rating on Sun. "We believe part of Compaq's server softness is due to the (Sun) 450's success," Jones said in a note to clients. "We believe it is benefitting from the confusion due to the DEC-Compaq merger, surrounding Alpha server direction," Jones also said. Jones noted that Sun's unveiling of the 450 Server last August was targeted directly at Compaq and servers running the Windows NT operating system. Sun was up 4-13/32 to 42-3/16 in very active trading. Jones said that his share price target for Sun is $53. Lehman Brothers analyst George Elling reiterated a buy on Sun, saying that the recent weakness in the stock created a buying opportunity for Sun investors, who had overreacted to Intel Corp and Compaq's earnings shortfall warnings. Analysts also said Sun executives spoke at a Morgan Stanley investor conference Monday and said that Asia-Pacific and Japan have been weaker this quarter but that strong sales in the U.S. and Europe would offset any weakness in Asia. "In view of Sun's strength in the U.S. and European markets, we are confident that they will be close to our earnings estimate (of $0.60 a share), although due to Asia it could be a few pennies off," Elling said in a note. "It (Sun) is the cleanest story around," said Daniel Kunstler, a J.P. Morgan analyst. "In Asia-Pacific, what dominates is the low-end of the line. Their offset discussion is perfectly credible."