SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: drmorgan who wrote (13636)3/11/1998 9:14:00 AM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
Smart Bits: 3Com Provides Switch For N.C. Campus Card

American Banker
Tue, Mar 11 1998

3Com Corp., a prominent communications networking provider, said Guilford
College is using its CoreBuilder switch to support the campus smart card program.

The 1,500-student college, in Greensboro, N.C., has installed an advanced network
based on ATM-asynchronous transfer mode-that gives everyone on campus
high-speed e-mail, Lotus Notes, intranet, and Internet access, while streamlining a
host of administrative and financial functions.

guide-p.infoseek.com

o~~~ O



To: drmorgan who wrote (13636)3/11/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
Virtual Nets: Web Sparks Real
Growth

Date: 3/11/98
Author: Reinhardt Krause

Every day, companies face the choice: Should they
manage their data networks themselves or hire outside
companies to do the job?

That dilemma is magnified for Internet-based virtual
private networks. It's a new type of network that can be
complex.

VPNs - ''virtually'' private in that they use the public
Internet - provide a way to send private business data
over the Web securely. VPNs let data on computer
servers be accessed by a company's satellite offices,
telecommuters working from home or key customers.

Communications still travel along the public Internet,
but the data are scrambled by encryption for security.

Many companies have jumped into the business of
running VPNs, and with good reason. The market is
expected to boom, analysts say. And there are many
ways to get a piece of the pie.

''VPNs are a partnership between service providers and
corporations,'' said Michael Howard, president of
Infonetics Research Inc. ''Systems integrators can do a
little or 100% of it.''

VPN expenditures for integration, or outsourcing, will
rise to almost $2 billion in 2001 from only $425 million in
1999 and a mere $45 million in 1997, says San Jose,
Calif.-based Infonetics.

Most corporations already lease private-line
connections from long-distance phone carriers. With a
VPN, companies can lower costs by using the existing
Internet instead of building their own, more expensive,
private networks, says David Goodtree, an analyst at
Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Mass.

Security is one reason companies hire third-party firms
to manage their VPNs. Even large corporations can lack
the in-house skills needed to start a VPN and put
security in place.

Among companies offering VPN services are the leading
long- distance phone companies: AT&T Corp., MCI
Communications Corp. and Sprint Corp.

Companies also can opt to farm out the VPN to a big
Internet service provider, such as PSINet Inc. or GTE
Corp.'s BBN Unit, or to companies that set up and
maintain computer systems, such as Plano, Texas-based
Electronic Data Systems Corp.

Outsourcing VPN work to a network-savvy phone or
systems company makes sense, says Dan Merriman, an
analyst at Giga Information Group in Cambridge, Mass.

The communications system, rather than any hardware
or software, is the key to VPNs, he says. ''With a VPN,
you're really building security capability onto a
communications service,'' Merriman said.

He points out that phone carriers already specialize in
providing highly reliable, consistent performance -
essential for VPNs.

Sprint offers several outsourcing options, says Sue
Sentell, Sprint Business vice president of marketing.

Companies may need help designing a VPN, setting it
up or operating it day to day, she says. Sprint will do
any or all of those tasks.

Designing a VPN often involves replacing leased phone
lines in an existing wide-area network. Many companies
lease Frame Relay lines from carriers for high-speed data
traffic.

That's where AT&T thinks it has an edge.

''We think customers want support in a hybrid
networking environment, where they have public
networking (the Internet), private networking over
Frame Relay, and virtual private networking,'' said Eric
Wohlford, director of AT&T Worldnet business service
marketing.

Wohlford says companies may be able to reuse many
existing connections to set up their VPNs.

To attract customers, AT&T promises to carry VPN
traffic on its own Internet backbone, or connections.
This provides a higher level of network availability.

Washington, D.C.-based MCI's strategy is similar, said
Bob Smith, MCI's senior manager of Internet marketing.

Moving a customer's VPN to MCI's own Internet
backbone offers added security, he says.

''Security is a core competency of ours,'' Smith said.

In fact, many companies setting up VPNs are expected
to outsource just the security aspect of those networks.
Managing security consists of several parts:
authentication - determining who is trying to access
data; encryption -scrambling data so they can't be read
by unwanted people; and authorization -overseeing
which software applications or data can be accessed
and by whom.

Some security is handled by ''firewalls'' - special-purpose
computer hardware or software that resides on company
networks to block access from outsiders.

More companies are looking to hire outside companies,
at least to help manage their firewalls, Giga's Merriman
says.

Phone companies, for example, have skill in ''tunneling''
software. This software encrypts data into tamperproof
formats and creates private connections over the
Internet.

That's important because key VPN users are corporate
employees who need to access the network from their
homes or while traveling.

Help desks also need VPNs. Help desks are companies'
specialized information centers that handle queries from
employees, customers and partners.

Companies are looking to outsource help-desk services,
MCI's Smith says.

Of course, all these services will cost corporate VPN
users money. When they look at the bottom line, some
companies will decide to outsource the entire VPN setup
and management. That will mean a good source of
business for the service providers.

''Some customers want the carrier to (have) end-to-end
responsibility,'' said AT&T's Wohlford. ''For that,
they're willing to pay a premium.''

(C) Copyright 1998 Investors Business Daily, Inc.



To: drmorgan who wrote (13636)3/11/1998 12:00:00 PM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
Internet Performance 60% Faster This Year Than 1997 -- Keynote Systems
Announces Internet Performance Results for January and February
11:01 a.m. Mar 11, 1998 Eastern

Major Outages Degraded Performance by 20 Percent from January to February

SAN MATEO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 11, 1998--
During the first two months of 1998, overall Internet performance was
60 percent faster than during the comparable period of 1997 according
to measurements announced today by Keynote Systems, the recognized
authority on Internet performance.

Despite this dramatic improvement over the previous year, overall
Internet performance the first two weeks of February 1998 degraded 20
percent from January's levels, primarily due to outages at the
MAE-West Network Access Point (NAP) and major backbone providers.

These performance results are based on 180,000 measurements conducted
each week for the Keynote Business 40 Internet Performance Index, a
standard index of the overall health and performance of the Internet
that measures the time required to access and download pages from 40
important business World Wide Web sites. A graph depicting Internet
performance over the past year can be found on Keynote's web site at
keynote.com.

Four of the eight weeks in January and February saw major Internet
outages, three of which involved problems at the MAE-East and MAE-West
NAPs. Two of these outages seriously degraded overall Internet
performance early in February, with performance averages of 26.41
seconds in the first week of the month and 26.53 in the second week
compared to average performance between 21 and 22 seconds for each
week of January. Performance worsened somewhat the third week as
problems in the west-coast network of GTE/BBN (NYSE:GTE) degraded
performance for many users attempting to access web sites on that
backbone.

After the outages of early February, the month settled down and weekly
performance returned to the 21-second range measured the previous
month. January's performance was 13% slower than the last week of
December as Internet use increased after the Christmas and New Year's
holidays. Thursday, Jan. 22, was a particularly bad performance day
for the web sites of USA Today, The New York Times, and CNNfn, owing
to increased Internet traffic and congestion by users at work seeking
up-to-the-minute news about the evolving White House sex scandal that
was announced the previous day.

Table of Weekly and Monthly Average Performance

...................................1998.....1997
January.......week 1.....22.09....36.05
...................week 2....21.09....37.67
...................week 3....21.00....32.88
...................week 4....21.59....34.10
..................average....21.44....35.17

February......week 1....26.41....45.83
...................week 2....26.53....40.90
...................week 3....23.45....46.29
...................week 4....21.19....38.56
..................average....24.39....42.89

The fastest metropolitan areas from which to access the Internet
Pittsburgh, Atlanta, and Boston.

The slowest metro areas included Minneapolis/St. Paul;
Dallas/Ft. Worth; Washington, D.C.; Tampa; San Diego; and Columbus.

The significant variation in performance by users' geographic locations
illustrates the performance differences among backbone providers,
Internet technologies, routing and traffic patterns.

How the Keynote Business 40 Internet Performance Index is Calculated


The Keynote Business 40 Internet Performance Index reflects overall
Internet performance by measuring the average response time experienced
by users in 27 metropolitan areas around the United States accessing
standard web content from a mix of 40 important business World Wide
Web sites during the peak business hours of 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

To gather data for the Index, Keynote Systems uses its Keynote Perspective
service to measure how long it takes to access and download a web page
via industry-standard HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol), the same
protocol used by the Microsoft (NASDAQAQ:MSFT) and Netscape
(NASDAQAQ:NSCP) web browsers, every 15 minutes around the clock from
each of the 40 web sites included in the Index.

Although Keynote has 48 measurement locations around the world, the
Index is calculated only from the measurements taken by the 38 software
measurement agents located in 27 major metropolitan areas around the
United States. This produces over 180,000 performance measurements
each week for the Index. The 40 Web Sites on the Keynote Business 40
Internet Performance Index

The Keynote Business 40 Internet Performance Index comprises performance
measurements for 40 public web sites in six categories:

Publishing
-- CNET (NASDAQ:CNWK)
-- New York Times (NYSE:NYT)
-- TechWeb (NASDAQ:CMPX)
-- The Wall Street Journal (NYSE:DJ)

Search Engines and Directories
-- Excite (NASDAQ:XCIT)
-- InfoSeek (NASDAQ:SEEK)
-- Lycos (NASDAQ:LCOS)
-- Yahoo (NASDAQ:YHOO)

Business Services
-- Dilbert (United Media) (NASDAQ:UNEWY)
-- Dun & Bradstreet (NYSE:DNB)
-- Federal Express (NYSE:FDX)
-- United Parcel Service

Financial Services
-- Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCH)
-- Fidelity
-- Merrill Lynch (NYSE:MER)

High Technology
-- 3Com (NASDAQ:COMS)
-- Apple Computer (NASDAQ:AAPL)
-- Bay Networks (NYSE:BAY)
-- Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO)
-- Compaq (NYSE:CPQ)
-- Dell (NASDAQ:DELL)
-- Digital Equipment (NYSE:DEC)
-- IBM (NYSE:IBM)
-- Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)
-- Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
-- Netscape (NASDAQ:NSCP)
-- Novell (NASDAQ:NOVL)
-- Oracle (NASDAQ:ORCL)
-- Sun Microsystems (NASDAQ:SUNW)

Communications
-- AT&T (NYSE:T)
-- MCI (NASDAQ:MCIC)
-- Sprint (NYSE:FON)

About Keynote Systems

Keynote Systems is the premier supplier of Internet performance data and
diagnostic services to
corporations with business-critical web sites. The company markets Keynote
Perspective, a global
real-time service that measures, compares and assures the Quality of Service
of corporate
Internet sites around the world. The foundation of the service is an extensive
network of
customizable software measurement agents connected to the major Internet
backbones in dozens
of metropolitan areas worldwide plus a sophisticated operations center for
collecting and
disseminating Internet performance data.

Keynote customers include some of the world's busiest and most successful
corporate Internet
web sites and web-hosting companies -- including American Express (NYSE:AXP),
DIGEX,
Exodus Communications, IBM Corporation (NYSE:IBM), Intel Corporation
(NASDAQ:INTC),
The SABRE Group (NYSE:TSG), Sun Microsystems (NASDAQ:SUNW), and Ziff-Davis --
which use the service to improve customer satisfaction and ensure
competitiveness.

For further information about Keynote Perspective, or to schedule a free one-
week performance
appraisal of a web site, visit Keynote's web site at keynote.com or
contact the
company at Keynote Systems, Inc., Two West Fifth Avenue, San Mateo, California
94402,
telephone 650/524-3000, fax 650/524-3099, email info@keynote.com

(See also: businesswire.com)

o~~~ O



To: drmorgan who wrote (13636)3/11/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: Moonray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22053
 
Newsflashes - March 11, 1998 - Boardwatch article

Boardwatch magazine's March cover story reports the magazine's tests
of 56K modem performance. In their tests, a U.S. Robotics Sportster x2
massively outperformed a Hayes Accura K56flex.


The article is already generating controversy on comp.dcom.modems, and
on a number of mailing lists.

I personally find the numbers a little hard to believe. In the 56K.COM
reader speed survey, x2 had an advantage over K56flex modems, but not
by the margins reported by Boardwatch. In Boardwatch's test, the Hayes
Accura only once achieved a 40K initial connect speed, and most of the
connects were at 36K or less. In contrast, the Hayes survey results
for units with recent firmware showed many connects in the high 40s,
with correspondingly high FTP transfer rates for compressed files.

The Boardwatch tests don't seem to jibe with other published test
results. The Macworld modem review noted here last week includes a
performance chart that shows little difference between x2 and K56flex
units.

News.com is also covering the Boardwatch story.

56k.com

Did you send them the Boardwatch info?

o~~~ O



To: drmorgan who wrote (13636)3/11/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: Moonray  Respond to of 22053
 
Local Internet companies show bigger not always better
02:02 p.m Mar 11, 1998 Eastern

LOS ANGELES (Reuters)- With the big players in the Internet access business
cutting prices or taking other steps to attract subscribers, you'd expect small
companies to head for the hills.

Such is not the case. In fact, a recent report says local Internet service providers,
or ISPs, are faring better than their national counterparts.

In a recent survey of 55 ISPs conducted by Forrester Research, the Cambridge,
Mass., Internet industry researcher, 77 percent of the local providers said they
were profitable, compared with 7 percent of national providers.

But good times for local ISPs may be short-lived. Forrester also predicted that in
five years, when high-speed Internet access through cable modem and digital
telephone line is available, local ISPs will account for only 15 percent of all Internet
users, dropping from 31 percent today.

A closer look at three local ISPs shows how these mainly small, privately held
businesses are succeeding in the face of formidable competition, and why they
believe they can continue to do well despite the odds.

Start with InReach Internet (http://www.inreach.com), a Stockton, Calif., company
with 20,000 residential Internet customers spread throughout the state.

Like its national competitors, InReach charges a flat $19.95 a month for unlimited
access. But unlike America Online (http://www.aol.com), AT&T WorldNet
(http://www.att.com/worldnet/) and others, InReach never waives set-up fees or
gives away a free month to new customers, both moves company officials say help
keep it in the black. Officials declined to disclose earnings or revenue, but said
subscriber revenue is climbing 10 percent a month.

Another reason InReach is successful: employees are more committed than
workers at larger companies, according to David Diskin, a company product
manager.

''If you look at PacBell or AT&T, so many employees don't care about the ISP
service because they don't have a vested interest in it,'' Diskin said.

Until now, InReach has grown by sticking to the residential Internet access
business, but the company is hedging its bets by branching out to provide Web
hosting, dial-up and other services for business customers. The company also
resells bandwidth to 30 smaller California ISPs, a business that could become ''a
huge revenue stream for us,'' Diskin said.

Where most small ISPs still rely on word of mouth to bring in new customers, some
more savvy -- and well-off -- companies run advertising and direct-mail programs
similar to campaigns from national ISPs.

Teleport Internet Services (http://www.teleport.com), a Portland, Ore., provider
with 27,000 customers and undisclosed profits on annual revenue of about $6
million, began advertising for the first time in December.

''We did it cautiously because if we had a problem, we'd hear from our customers
that we're just like AOL,'' said Teleport President James Deibele.

Unlike large corporations that can finance money-losing Internet operations with
earnings from other businesses, local ISPs can't grab market share with low prices
then hope profits will follow, Deibele said. Instead, small providers have to spend
enough on marketing and technology to attract new customers but not enough to
bankrupt the company, he said.

But Deibele isn't worrying too much about bigger competitors, given the slow start
they're off to in his area.

''Right now when the cable companies install a cable modem they send two people
out, the computer guy and the cable guy, and that's not cost effective,'' Deibele
said. ''Phone companies talk about new and improved phone lines, but the phone
companies don't have enough people to do the old stuff, so where are they going to
get the people to do the new stuff?''

Officials at InterAccess Co. (http://www.interaccess.com), a Chicago area ISP
with about 19,000 dial-up Internet customers, believe customer service sets them
apart from the dozens of competitors in the city, including major players such as
Ameritech (http://www.ameritech.com).

''We have 50 people answering phones out of a company of 75 or 80. That's been a
distinguishing characteristic for us from our early days, when competitors had one
or two and we had 4 or 5,'' said Eric Gautschi, InterAccess marketing
communications director.

As part of its customer service, InterAccess quickly supported both 3Com's ''x2''
and Rockwell's ''K56flex'' 56 Kbps modems after subscribers asked for them, and
was one of the first ISPs to offer high-speed service to business customers.

Such responsiveness should help InterAccess grow to $10.5 million in revenue this
year, a 50 percent increase over 1997, Gautschi said. The company has been
profitable since 1994 though Gautschi would not be more specific.

''People have been predicting the downfall of small ISPs since the day we went
into business,'' Gautschi said. ''We believe we'll be around for the long haul because
we're small and local and can be very responsive to customer needs.''

''A lot of large national companies and telephone companies are used to a whole
different world where they owned the market, where they had a monopoly,'' he
added. ''They didn't have to be clever and quick. But unless they completely
remake themselves to be like small ISPs, and that's a tall order, they're the ones
looking for trouble.''

o~~~ O