Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Liteglow (LTGL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (717)	3/11/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Roo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4715

When it comes to squeezes and cert campaigns, there are a lot of wary investors out there today (and weary as well...) that are sitting on certs from previous short squeeze attempts. I happen to personally be a believer that naked shorting happens, and that an organized effort can not only drive out the shorts, but also dramatically increase share value in the process. Without becoming overzealous, is there anyone who can make a mathematically compelling case for this stock being shorted based on float and trading volumes over the past few weeks? I believe asking people to sign up for a cert campaign can be successful, and even those who have been burned before can be convinced, but the case has to be mathematically solid and the figures have to be publicly verifiable. If anyone on this thread is good at that kind of research, I'm willing to listen! -ROO BTW, nice upticks so far this morning, last trade .12