SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : (LVLT) - Level 3 Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Phil Jacobson who wrote (313)3/12/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Jim Furley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3873
 
Has anyone noticed Julie Stangl has removed her email address from the L3 website? She must have been flooded with letters. My phone call to Julie must be lost in her voice mail jail so I looked up her email address from post 28 and sent her the following letter:

Dear Julie,

I am a shareholder and would like to ask you a few questions.

I have been to your web site, but am not finding the answers I'm looking for. Can you share any information on the following?

1. Does L3 plan on raising money by offering an IPO? If so, approximately when might that be?

2. Does L3ÿ plan on moving to the Nasdaq or NYSE? If so, when? Symbol change?

3. Has the board discussed a split?

Any public information you can share with me would be appreciated. Have a great day and Thank You!

Jim Furley



To: Phil Jacobson who wrote (313)3/12/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: MangoBoy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3873
 
CNBC: faber's piece was polite but not favorable. raised questions of valuation.

why will it cost L3 $10B to build out a 20K mile network when QWST's capex for their 16K mile network is closer to $2B (and already paid for via dark fiber sales)? gotta add all that debt into any calculation of L3's book value.



To: Phil Jacobson who wrote (313)3/12/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: Diana R. Chambers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3873
 
And it did bounce way back from its low--a good sign. MFS was also volatile (as the earlier poster said), but it showed good relative strength during the various tech wrecks along the way.