Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: W.F. Schwertley who wrote (9833)	3/12/1998 4:47:00 PM
From: Tom Frederick	Respond to of 20681

Mr. Schwertley. OK, lets put it this way...How hard would you work at figuring out a way to minimize costs to mine a $2 to $3 TRILLION dollar asset from the ground? I don't know about you, but I would work my bleeding hands off figuring it out. Again, these tests are using the worst method possible to prove the ore content. It was done to prove to the world that the most standard testing of all, standard lead fire assay, proves gold and proves it in commercially viable amounts. AND this is gold only. The Johnson prep is most mechanical and does not to my knowledge use expensive chemicals to any degree. Again, Kim could best answer this question. Not to be redundant, but I feel confident that testing will continue to improve results and recovery will show the true content. Regards, Tom F.

To: W.F. Schwertley who wrote (9833)	3/12/1998 4:51:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

<<Remember those mysterious arbatrator grinding machines. I still haven't figured out how to spell the name of the damn thing. >> The correct spelling is "attritor." (I did a Yahoo search when people started mentioning it on this thread some months ago). Given today's press release, does the damn thing work on FL ore or not?