Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Fox who wrote (50620)	3/15/1998 11:31:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 186894

Jeff and ALL, Article...Cheap PCs don't draw new buyers... By Kurt Oeler Staff Writer, CNET NEWS.COM March 13, 1998, 4:40 p.m. PT update Despite steep prices cuts and a bevy of new products specifically introduced for the sub-$1,000 market, PC makers haven't been able to attract new buyers, according to a new study. The penetration of PCs climbed to 42 percent of U.S. homes in the last six months, but repeat buyers still made up two-thirds of those who bought a consumer PC, reports San Francisco-based market research firm Odyssey. The company's semiannual "Homefront" study pegged PC penetration at 39 percent six months ago, and 37 percent one year ago. Of those buying a home computer in the past six months, only 35 percent were first-time buyers, Odyssey found in a survey of 2,500 customers. That's an increase from 32 percent in the similar period ending January 1997, but down from 49 percent in both January 1996 and January 1995. Sub-$1,000 machines played little role in the growth, according to Odyssey. "We didn't see what many expected to be a huge increase, despite the fact that PC manufacturers basically cut their prices in half," said the company's director of business development, Elizabeth Atcheson. "Even more troubling to PC makers, the percentage to first-time buyers stayed the same, at about one out of three. Earlier this week, rival research firm Computer Intelligence (CI) preliminarily reported that PC penetration climbed from 40 to 45 percent in 1997, attributing a second-half surge to the popularity of the sub-$1,000 PC. CI believes the low-cost segment comprised as much as 40 percent of the PC market in the latter half of last year. "It is true that penetration went up, but it's still steady growth," Atcheson said. Despite the disagreement, both studies generally leave open the question: Who is purchasing more low-cost machines, first-timers or repeat buyers? The answer is important because it plays a role in determining how PC makers target their products to ensure continued growth. Sub-$1,000 machines are also significant to the industry because of their notoriously low margins. Lost revenues have to be made up in volume, but so far, even industry leaders haven't been able do so. Compaq and Intel recently preannounced their earnings would fall short of expectations this quarter, citing lagging sales, but industry analysts have said the sales are there, but the margins aren't. "PC sales will not defy traditional laws of economics," Atcheson said. "[PC makers] are learning the hard way that PC sales are not all that elastic with regard to price." ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Well, this article seems to conflict other articles recently. My instinct tells me this article is closer to the truth. Parents buying an inexpensive second computer for their kids, and normal upgrades seems to be the primary force driving retail sales. This begs the question...What will it take to get those millions of homes who have never purchased a PC to take the plunge? Intel's on the spot technical assistance is surely one response to this problem, which is a darn good one. More definitely needs to be done! My solution....MARKETING! Intel should get out there and spend some of those billions on an advertising blitz second to none. And it should be targeted Television commercials, radio adds, print and so forth. They should also dump those silly bunnies hopping around and get serious! Does anyone really think those bunnies have caused many people to buy a computer who never owned one before?? About the only thing I have been critical about is their marketing. With the billions they have, people should be talking about Intel adds at water-coolers around the world. They are not. Hopping bunnies are not cutting it. Michael