SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Abner Hosmer who wrote (10491)3/14/1998 12:55:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20981
 
My point may have been misunderstood. I don't care who you or Slick has sex with. I wasn't there that day (away on business) so I don't know for a fact that anything happened against anybody's wishes. I believe somebody bigger is still trying to figure that out so apparently I'm not the only one who doesn't know.

I do wonder if laws were broken during all the events which happened afterward. If there were, fine. Kill the guy. I don't care&#151I didn't vote for him. If not, let him go.

Hope that's clear. I broke my earlier promise to myself to not waste very much time with this thread as it isn't very relevant to my life. Maybe worthy of the odd post or two&#151not much more.

-MrB



To: Abner Hosmer who wrote (10491)3/14/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20981
 
So I guess the part about a female subordinate entering the executive's office to discuss her employment and finding his hands on her boobs and her hand pressed up against his stiff rod isn't the issue that bothers you.

Why do you automatically assume she's telling the truth? Evidently she's offered quite a few different versions of her story by now. Casting about for the highest bidder?

And why, exactly, DID she have her hand pressed up against his stiff rod?