Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ballard Power -world leader zero-emission PEM fuel cells -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Barron Von Hymen who wrote (1877)	3/14/1998 10:17:00 PM
From: Hawkeye	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5827

Sorry, you are not making sense to me. Please re-read my post and your reply and try again. I said Ford, not GM. Who's not being logical here? Why on earth would United Technologies NOT want a car company to work with them? When you get it together, let me know.

To: Barron Von Hymen who wrote (1877)	3/15/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Hawkeye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5827

I'm sorry, I've tried and I still don't get your point. You seem to be saying, after correcting for the GM/Ford mixup, that United Tech. could have as good or better fuel cell as BLD's yet not only would they NOT want the strategic support of one of the big 3 auto co's but Ford would actually buy into a competitor since they couldn't get the bang for their buck buying United. Is this correct? If so it still sounds silly when I say it. Makes no sense from a business standpoint. I must have misconstrued a point here or something. I love your profile though, so James Bondish. Regards