Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (6856)	3/15/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Pete Schueler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

marcos, You wrote... "The best interests of the nation of Venezuela are served, imho, not by negating the legitimate claim to LC of Inversora Mael, nor by ejecting Placer from the country without compensation for its investment in a game whose rules it was following at the time of making that investment, but by limiting the damage caused by the history of the conflicting claims. So I do not see a decision coming that is 100% in favor of one side or the other." I would agree with that except if there is strong evidence before the court that Placer knowingly was conspiring with MEM and CVG to circumvent lawful disposition of LC. Regards, Pete

To: marcos who wrote (6856)	3/16/1998 12:37:00 AM
From: charred	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10836

Hello marcos: You say you have some experience in latin american courts. Therefore you should know once a title is given it can not be taken away. The law suit will be with KRY and MEM. The Ministry will have to pay damages if Mael wins. Placer has nothing to do with the law suit. KRY is suing for the right to be heard nothing more. Placer has the right to the concessions. Just back from an extensive trip, it seems I miss a lot on this thread. One thing about this company (KRY) is that it has too many lawyers following it. This scares me. For the past 2 hours I looked at the previous replies and there is not one response on the geology. This is sad. To many people talk about $25 a share, how can this be. No one has explained why the stock is valued at $25. What a joke. Who will the management sue next? charred