SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ratan lal who wrote (34431)3/16/1998 11:02:00 AM
From: jbn3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Ratan,

Have you read the Harvard Business Review article, an interview with Michael Dell? If not, I would be happy to send it to you. There is a catch, though... (NO free lunches <g>) After you read it, I would appreciate it if you would post your thoughts about how effectively Ingram will compete with DELL, positively or negatively.

I personally believe that Ingram is trying to compete with DELL using a variation of DELL's model. (Looks like they will use the OEMs to provide the order base and provide the customer service, and they will do all the build to order assembly) However, like CPQs acquisition of DEC, I don't think it will be as easy or as smooth a ride as many expect. DELL is offering their customer-partners so much more than Ingram can provide. How can Ingram, for instance, represent any one of their customers 100% with the consumer? Where does Ingram's chief interest lie -- with the value added for the consumer, or with the profit notched by its customers? And I would imagine that adding one more layer between the customer and the supplier does not enhance efficiency. Or price, unless Ingram has decided to sell at cost. Are all the other producers -- CPQ, HWP, IBM -- content with becoming purely service organizations, letting Ingram do all the production? How large a royalty will Ingram pay DELL to use DELL patents? Just a few of the questions buzzing in my bonnet.

Regards, 3.